December 15, 2006
Room 302,
Senators
Grant Larson, Jayne Mockler, John Schiffer and Kathryn Sessions;
Representatives
Roy Cohee, Ross Diercks and Randall Luthi.
Senators
Hank Coe and Bill Hawks;
Representatives
Doug Osborn and Wayne Reese .
Dave Gruver
Please refer to Appendix 1 to review the
Committee Sign-in Sheet for a list of other individuals who attended the
meeting.
All
meeting materials and handouts provided to the Committee by the Legislative
Service Office (LSO), public officials, lobbyists, and the public are
referenced in the Meeting Materials Index, attached to the minutes. These materials are on file at the LSO and are
part of the official record of the meeting.
Chairman
Cohee called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m.
State investments
Deputy
State Treasurer Sharon Garland and chief financial officer Michael
Walden-Newman provided the Committee with information regarding state
investments and diversification which has occurred over the past eight years. Included in that presentation were three
packets of material. (Appendices 3
through 5). Appendix 3 is the Treasurer's
report to shareholders which summarizes changes in assets under management and
investments with comparison dates of June 30, 1998 and December 1, 2006. Investments under management totaled $8.2
billion as of 2006 fiscal year end, and over $8.6 billion in total market value
on September 30, 2006, a $5 billion increase in eight years. The Treasurer's statement identifies the
change into a diversified asset allocation as the most significant achievement. In the past eight years, asset allocations
for the permanent Wyoming Mineral trust fund and permanent land funds have been
changed from 95% fixed income and cash to 50% equities and 50% fixed
income. Permanent funds are now invested
in each major asset class. Appendix 4 is
a condensed version of appendix 3.
Appendix 5 is a quarterly investment performance analysis.
Secretary
of State and Treasurer-elect Joe Meyer addressed the Committee. Secretary Meyer provided a letter to Committee members
outlining his intentions regarding a review of asset allocation and general
investment strategies and management costs as he transitions to the office of
State Treasurer. (Appendix 6) He noted that he will take some time to fully
understand all state investment policy issues and ramifications, but that his
overarching premise will be that the investment policy and associated issues
are transparent. Secretary Meyer also
provided information prepared by the
State's investment manager, RV Kuhns.
(Appendices 7 and 8). Appendix 7
is an explanation of asset allocations, and underlying strategies and
assumptions related to asset allocation.
Appendix 8 is a primer on state investment strategy and history,
including state investment policy and asset allocation developed over the past
eight years.
Higher education
endowment funds
The
Committee next discussed draft legislation (07 LSO 242.C1 and 243.C1,
appendices 9 and 10). LSO staff explained
that the two pieces of legislation both dealt with higher education endowment
funds. The first with the inviolate
nature of the funds and investment of the funds. The second with establishing spending policy
amounts for the funds. Staff provided
the following for the Committee's consideration:
1.
A memo dated October 12, from LSO staff, regarding the issues presented
by the passage of the constitutional amendment on higher education funds and
the draft legislation. (Appendix
11) Those issues include the designation of the
Hathaway endowment account and the excellence in higher education endowment
account as inviolate funds by the Constitution, and whether further legislation
is necessary or appropriate as a result of that designation. A further question is whether spending policy
amounts should be developed for those funds, and if so, how that should be
implemented.
2.
A memo from Rick Miller,
3. Flow charts explaining the funding
of the Hathaway endowment and the excellence in higher education endowment and current
spending policies for the common school account and permanent mineral trust
fund. (Appendix 13)
LSO
staff explained that the draft bills had been delivered to Secretary Meyer recently
and he suggested that the Committee and the Legislature should consider certain
additional issues presented by the Constitutional amendment and draft
legislation. Secretary Meyer addressed
the Committee and summarized his December 15 memo to the Committee, explaining
the issues presented. (Appendix 14) He noted it was not his intent to kill the
legislation, but to raise issues he thought should be addressed.
The
Committee, Secretary Meyer and LSO staff discussed the issues presented, which
included the inviolate nature of the funds and what "inviolate"
entails, the manner in which the funds are currently held and invested, whether
state permanent funds should be invested by private endowments and what
policies would govern those investments.
LSO staff provided information regarding Attorney General formal
opinions on the issues of "inviolate". Staff also provided the Committee with a
draft bill which would provide for investment of excellence in higher education
endowment funds by the State Treasurer, rather than the Institutions'
foundations through contractual arrangements as provided in current law. (LSO 242.W2).
Staff noted the draft had been prepared the day before the meeting. It did not address spending policy issues or
reserve accounts, but there was an amendment which would address those issues,
should the Committee decide to proceed with this version of the bill.
The
Committee discussed how to proceed.
Draft 242.C1 failed for lack of a motion. The Committee next discussed the alternative
to that draft (242.W2, Appendix 15).
Senator Mockler moved the Committee sponsor the draft in the upcoming
session. Committee members expressed
reservations regarding knowing the exact impact of the draft and the lack of
distribution of the draft to the public and interested parties. The motion failed 0-7. The Committee directed staff to meet with
interested parties, including the Attorney General's Office, the University and
community college representatives and Secretary Meyer and attempt to address
the issues raised. Senator Schiffer
clarified that the draft was to include spending policy provisions. The Committee requested that LSO post the revised
draft under the Committee's name on the legislative website in order for the
public to have an opportunity to review the potential bill before the
session. The Committee also discussed
the possibility of a new Committee being appointed earlier than normal in order
to take action on the revised draft.
Draft 243.C1 died for lack of a motion.
Staff
presented a proposed spending policy report, required by law to be submitted by
the Committee to the Legislature each year.
Since the Committee took no action to establish spending policies for the
higher education endowments, the draft report simply recites the history of the
spending policies for the permanent mineral trust fund and common school account,
acknowledges the State Treasurer recommended no changes for this year to either
spending policy, and states that the Committee agrees with that recommendation
and makes the same to the Legislature.
(Appendix 16)
The
Committee adjourned at 5:30 p.m.
Respectfully
submitted,
Representative Roy Cohee, Chairman