Department
of insurance-licensure revisions. |
11LSO-0057.C1 |
FISCAL NOTE
FY 2012 |
FY 2013 |
FY 2014 |
|
NON-ADMINISTRATIVE
IMPACT |
|
|
|
Anticipated Revenue
Increase: |
|
|
|
GENERAL
FUND |
$312,750 |
$344,025 |
$378,428 |
COUNTY SCHOOL
FUND |
$25,483 |
$25,483 |
$25,483 |
|
|
|
|
Anticipated Revenue
Decrease: |
|
|
|
GENERAL
FUND |
$520 |
$520 |
$520 |
Source
of revenue increase:
The
draft bill proposes two sources of revenue increases. First, the biennial
continuation fees for nonresident surplus lines brokers, adjusters and consultants
are increased from $100 to $150. This revenue is deposited in the
general fund. Second, the bill proposes to impose a reinstatement penalty
for persons reinstating a license that lapsed for failure to file continuing
education. The proposed reinstatement penalty would be equal to the
continuation fee. Pursuant to the proposed bill, the continuation fee for
nonresident adjusters will increase to $150. All fines and penalties are
deposited in the public school fund of the county in which the violation
occurred.
Assumptions:
With
respect to the continuation fee increase, the calculation is based on the
number of licensees as of September 30, 2010, with the anticipated increase of new
licensees at 10% per year. The total number of nonresident adjusters,
surplus lines brokers and consultants for 2010 is estimated at 12,510.
With a 10% increase for each license type, the numbers for 2011 and 2012 are
13,761 and 15,137 respectively. Because the license term is two years,
only half of the licensees would renew in each fiscal year reported
above. With a $50 increase in the continuation fee, the calculation is as
follows: 12510 divided by 2 (half renew in 2012) times the $50 increase in
continuation fees equals the estimated revenue increase of $312,750 (12510 /2 x
50 = 312750).
With
respect to the proposed reinstatement penalty, the calculation is based on the
average number of licensees who failed to renew a license for not complying
with the continuing education requirement. The average number of
resident producers who failed to renew for not being CE compliant in the past
three years is 8. The average number of nonresident adjusters who failed
to renew for not being CE compliant in the past three years is 164. All
other license types were compliant with the CE requirement for the past three
years. The Department assumes the trend will continue, although the
imposition of a penalty as contemplated by the proposed legislation may reduce
the number of individuals who fail to comply.
Source of Revenue
Decrease:
The draft bill proposes to
eliminate the application fee for consultants. Currently, the statutes
provide for an application fee of $20.
Assumptions:
The average number of new
consultant applications for the past 3 years is 26 per year.
Prepared by: Kelley
Shepp, LSO Phone: 777-7881
(Information provided by:
Stephanie Bryant McGee, Dept. of Insurance Phone:
777-6896)