File name: JACSupplementalBudget2011-2012_20110131_180345.dcr

Folder: C:\Documents and Settings\HAppropriations\Desktop\Recordings

 

     31 ~ 1/31/2011 6:05:28 PM ~ JAC Supplemental Budget Bill January 31, 2011

     57 ~ 1/31/2011 6:05:54 PM ~ Hastert:  May we open up some sections? Berger: Yes

   1:30 ~ 1/31/2011 6:06:26 PM ~ Bill:  Draft Bill in system..will work off of copy from Friday Passed out language omitted from University..needs inserted ,first two pages of handout Replacement pages for some agencies, pages after the first two, arthimatic errors

   3:14 ~ 1/31/2011 6:08:11 PM ~ Nicholas:  1.  Read language  2. Difference in position you thought was taken 3.  Was motion made but not what you intended  4.  Monday morning remorse significant to reopen budget Before we do roll call vote, everything in correctly

   4:45 ~ 1/31/2011 6:09:42 PM ~ Bill:  Staff not sure if captured intent in a few areas Bill draft tomorrow morning or afternoon to vote on

   5:11 ~ 1/31/2011 6:10:07 PM ~ Bill:  Every change or high points?

   5:34 ~ 1/31/2011 6:10:31 PM ~ Nicholas:  Every new item

   5:41 ~ 1/31/2011 6:10:37 PM ~ Nicholas:  pg 4 ...

   5:54 ~ 1/31/2011 6:10:50 PM ~ Bill:  typo...word natural as stricken Dave:  take word out

   6:27 ~ 1/31/2011 6:11:23 PM ~ Bill:

   6:38 ~ 1/31/2011 6:11:35 PM ~ Nicholas:  Old language in bill, new language in supplemental budget different color for new language

   7:06 ~ 1/31/2011 6:12:02 PM ~ Bill:  old language in only if it was amended,  section 048 is noticable Nicholas:  lighter font, darker font? Bill:  difference --new language will be underlined Nicholas : reason for different in font Bill:  could have been highlighted New language underlined, old language not Only language for agencies worked on Nicholas:  comment, natural out

   8:33 ~ 1/31/2011 6:13:30 PM ~ Bill:  Numbers: Added 250,000 in footnote 5, 610,000 for footnote 6, 100,000 for footnote 7

   9:15 ~ 1/31/2011 6:14:11 PM ~ Nicholas:  did not remember approving the additional person Bill:  did not change it, Nicholas:  govs rec--one person to distribute 610,00 Bill:  310,000 for state engineer ..200,000 for DOT and 100,000 for governor's office. Put it all in gov's office..for clarity

  10:42 ~ 1/31/2011 6:15:39 PM ~ Nicholas:  SE Wyoming Mineral Exploration Bill:  Niobrara oil play Von Flatern:  My fault, the way written seems like more,

  11:30 ~ 1/31/2011 6:16:27 PM ~ Bill:  Took it as how the 610,000 broke down Von Flatern:  just clarifying...gov's rec/note  reads like you add....misread

  12:01 ~ 1/31/2011 6:16:58 PM ~ Nicholas:  Thought you wer putting in 1 million 10 and putting in position Von Flatern:  Yes, I saw the position, did not question it

  12:34 ~ 1/31/2011 6:17:31 PM ~ Bill:  Dawn pointed out  one time limited full time and one time contracted ..should just be two awacs, can change the language,

  13:13 ~ 1/31/2011 6:18:10 PM ~ Nicholas:  1.2 issue and two positions issue..send it out the way tit is Danger in opening up these budgets

  13:41 ~ 1/31/2011 6:18:38 PM ~ Gruver:  Difference in AWAC so should specify

  14:05 ~ 1/31/2011 6:19:01 PM ~ Bill:  one time full time position. language does not make sense ..either way, the current position expires June 30, 2012, has a position for 15 months Nicholas:  Not in standard budget anyway

  15:10 ~ 1/31/2011 6:20:06 PM ~ Nicholas:  let Gov spend money however he wants,  heartburn creating a position in a footnote..eliminate the language in the position, let him sort it out

  15:46 ~ 1/31/2011 6:20:43 PM ~ Von Flatern:  Strike from word one down .. Nicholas:  Do not want to change the intent, if motion doesn't do harm,,inclined to do so To create a time limited positon makes no sense to me...intended to give Gov discretion

  16:44 ~ 1/31/2011 6:21:41 PM ~ Cox:  Original letter was total amount was 610,000, not 1.2 million, asked for contract position, and limited time full time position...gov can create AWAC, may be best to specify two awac and amount

  17:52 ~ 1/31/2011 6:22:48 PM ~ Nicholas:  one additional time limited position?

  18:32 ~ 1/31/2011 6:23:29 PM ~ Bill:  Difference in full time position and AWAC, full time position implies benefits, AWAC is just what the contract is.. have nto done time limijted in 15 yurs

  19:08 ~ 1/31/2011 6:24:05 PM ~ Nicholas:  One AWAC, .. Bill:  All 610,000 is in gov's budget, 100,000 for staffing transitions in footnote 7, end of changes in gov's office

  20:08 ~ 1/31/2011 6:25:05 PM ~ Bill:  20,000 admin line for Sec of State, footnote 3 for directorys

  20:23 ~ 1/31/2011 6:25:20 PM ~ Bill:  State auditor's office, note to talk Brucellousis testing, out of livestock board into auditor's office, footnote 2, gov's written approval for expenditure..talking to Richard...makes sense to take the salary and insurance money and add into two different lines in the state auditors, handled that way in the past Question:  do you want to pull the 6 million out of UW and have auditor dispurse?

  21:47 ~ 1/31/2011 6:26:44 PM ~ Nicholas: answer is yes Bill:  Not changing the substance, changing the mechanics

  22:04 ~ 1/31/2011 6:27:01 PM ~ Bill"  A&I .. human resources issue discussed Nicholas: # 4 goes to A& I Bill:  Yes footnnote will be pulled out.  I'm looking at page 7

  24:12 ~ 1/31/2011 6:29:08 PM ~ Nicholas  Your looking at A&I

  24:27 ~ 1/31/2011 6:29:23 PM ~ Mai  Over on the internal services money vehicle depreciation reserve

  25:09 ~ 1/31/2011 6:30:05 PM ~ Nicholas  You are going to include a cheat sheet for us

  25:31 ~ 1/31/2011 6:30:28 PM ~ Mai,  Yes we will

  25:41 ~ 1/31/2011 6:30:38 PM ~ Hestert  We have quite a bit of discussion

  26:03 ~ 1/31/2011 6:31:00 PM ~ Mai  If it is spelled out in the budget, you don't footnote those items.

  26:32 ~ 1/31/2011 6:31:29 PM ~ Nicholas  The budget bill is the narrative for the budget.  That way the governor cannot line item veto.  To the extent, if its in the budget bill, it is well described.  The governor could line item

  28:32 ~ 1/31/2011 6:33:29 PM ~ Mai  Dawn pointed out there is a substitute page  Agency 6   The at will employee will serve at the please of the director.    THere is a gentleman behind me that would like the governor included also.

  30:20 ~ 1/31/2011 6:35:17 PM ~ Nicholas  Why did he serve at the pleasure of one or the other.

  30:55 ~ 1/31/2011 6:35:52 PM ~ Berger  We are doing 5 first.

  32:08 ~ 1/31/2011 6:37:04 PM ~ Gruber  It doesn't state whether he serves at the pleasure of the gov. or not

  32:37 ~ 1/31/2011 6:37:34 PM ~ Nicholas   I think what that does is that is rolls into the biannual budget.

  33:42 ~ 1/31/2011 6:38:39 PM ~ Mai  Military Dept.  007  There is a footnote for the national guard.  For some salary short-fall, they are

  34:50 ~ 1/31/2011 6:39:47 PM ~ Hestert  Is this saying that when the gov. starts his budget does he not put it in his budget.

  35:43 ~ 1/31/2011 6:40:39 PM ~ Nicholas  It doesn't have anything to do with bianneum budget.

  36:23 ~ 1/31/2011 6:41:20 PM ~ Mai  The other line items that changed was VA processing.  There is also $57,000 added,  Origon trail for maintenance.  Next page  Office of Public Defender.  Dept. of Ag.   Natl. Resource increased   $250,000 added into State Fair Account.

  38:49 ~ 1/31/2011 6:43:46 PM ~ Nicholas  We have the same language in the bill.  We need to take it out of one another.

  39:33 ~ 1/31/2011 6:44:29 PM ~ Gruber  We will have to one or the other out.

  39:53 ~ 1/31/2011 6:44:50 PM ~ Mai   You added $25,000 to State Fair, pardon me $72,000  There is a new section 10  There is a digit dropped off in last years bill.  Section 20 DEQ  One change 1.5 mill.  for permit  Section 24  Parks and Natural Resources.  You added $50,000 for shelving  You added for $50,000 for microfilming.  We never footnoted vet memorials.  Wildlife Natural resouce account.

  43:58 ~ 1/31/2011 6:48:55 PM ~ Nicholas  When we do the cheatsheets.  When we ask if they are one time or ongoing.  Are wonder if it would be helpful to put the designation in the cheatsheet.  If it is one time just put OT

  45:39 ~ 1/31/2011 6:50:35 PM ~ Mai  Game and Fish Comm.  You added $  You does don't appropriate AWACS

  46:23 ~ 1/31/2011 6:51:20 PM ~ Wallis   I was just wondering why we don't have a line for them.

  46:43 ~ 1/31/2011 6:51:39 PM ~ Mai  THis money gets put in a 600 series   THe AWAC positions do show up in the A&I   DOT  Agency 045  Footnote 4 & 5  4 directs the commercial air footnote of that.

  48:58 ~ 1/31/2011 6:53:55 PM ~ Meier  How come this is footnoted?  Couldn't we shoehorn this into the budget wording.  I know that there was gerneral fund request from the governor.  Why

  50:16 ~ 1/31/2011 6:55:13 PM ~ Mai  I came as a GOv. Letter

  50:40 ~ 1/31/2011 6:55:37 PM ~ Mai  It is the progative of the committee to footnote

  51:05 ~ 1/31/2011 6:56:02 PM ~ Nicholas   IF there is ambaguity, that is the purpose

  51:56 ~ 1/31/2011 6:56:52 PM ~ Mai   THen there is footnote 5,  Footnote 6  You added $40,000.  Is this onetime?

  52:49 ~ 1/31/2011 6:57:46 PM ~ Nicholas  It applies to the new 40

  53:04 ~ 1/31/2011 6:58:01 PM ~ Von Flatern  Would it be easier to drop Footnote 6?

  53:47 ~ 1/31/2011 6:58:43 PM ~ Mai   The other footnote is 6 mill for the railraod crossing for a total of 46 mill.

  54:28 ~ 1/31/2011 6:59:25 PM ~ Nicholas  Did you reference a law that has not passed

  55:26 ~ 1/31/2011 7:00:22 PM ~ Mai   You have a replacement page for 045.

  55:50 ~ 1/31/2011 7:00:47 PM ~ Mai  Section 048  You are not going to be able to see all those changes   Community of Public Health Will be Community and Family Health.  You added $15,000 to that.  That will all come out of tabaco trust.  Health Care financing.  50/50 match

1:00:09 ~ 1/31/2011 7:05:05 PM ~ Bill:  200,000 Worksite wellness program, washakie crisis stabilization,, pg17   Nicholas:  ? Bill: pg 17 can add 200,000 to footnote 8 Berger: pg 16, footnote Washakie medical center in worland

1:02:33 ~ 1/31/2011 7:07:30 PM ~ Peterson:  ..not named Berger: old langauge which is pulled in

1:02:51 ~ 1/31/2011 7:07:48 PM ~ Bill:  Developmental disabilities...3 copies ...asked if you wanted to do just footnoted items 1 million + for preschool services,  footnote 10 - Division of aging.. 1 million for senior centers, discussion to be had.. 1.  Is the old formula the stautory formula?    If so, just need to put the 1 million in, take it out of the footnote, not add a footnote

1:05:30 ~ 1/31/2011 7:10:26 PM ~ Meier:  Both 40,000 and the 1 million be ...

1:05:49 ~ 1/31/2011 7:10:45 PM ~ Berger:  One time Meier: senior centers, problems with labor, my preference is leave it where it is at, not asked to do that, not motion made, what we voted on was to leave the 400,000 where it was, put 1 million into standard, carry both over to the biennulized budget...

1:07:24 ~ 1/31/2011 7:12:21 PM ~ Berger: increase in food costs, so est. formula based on salaries, old model based on cost of doing business..

1:07:43 ~ 1/31/2011 7:12:40 PM ~ Meier:  2009 spec. for labor costs, formula previous brought in labor and other factors.

1:08:02 ~ 1/31/2011 7:12:58 PM ~ Bill:  Maker of motion going back to stautory...does not matter to me, what is will of committee Staff notes indicated discussion was it would be bienialized.

1:09:15 ~ 1/31/2011 7:14:12 PM ~ Meier:  mentioned  meals on wheels, standard distribution formula, directed toward bringing up wages,

1:09:41 ~ 1/31/2011 7:14:37 PM ~ Nicholas:  Issue ..do not remember motion to open old language,

1:10:00 ~ 1/31/2011 7:14:57 PM ~ Bill:  No discussion of footnotes, then intent should be enough..direction of committee to remove 1 million from footnote Berger: yes

1:10:28 ~ 1/31/2011 7:15:24 PM ~ Bill: 90 millino for vets home services

1:10:57 ~ 1/31/2011 7:15:54 PM ~ Bill:  Livestock board: admin line for software and hardware, brand inspection in other funds column, wyolink, G form ,

1:11:39 ~ 1/31/2011 7:16:36 PM ~ Bill:  057  Community College Commission, state aid for GF 4 + million, for op. costs, 412,000 to Wyo public TV for truck upgrade, added back 550, 000 and footnote language back in. To be clear..this footnote language reverts the money June 30, 2012.  If not matched by then, will revert

1:12:51 ~ 1/31/2011 7:17:48 PM ~ Bill: 066 Wyo tourism bd, 3 +million for promotion programs UW section 67  talked about 6 million moved to state auditor's office Footnote 3 removed from this Added 3.5 million for the endowment footnote 5; that language is changed a bit in handout, cleaner UW other change:  addition of FMR monies, Senate appropriations dealing .. Footnote 4

1:14:21 ~ 1/31/2011 7:19:17 PM ~ Bill: Dept of corrections:  Added footnote in operations, utilities money and conditions of expenditure, not in 13,14 budget.  Added 50,000 for software, women's center and pen, a little bit of money for utilites not under auspices of footnote 4..actual budget line increases.

1:15:33 ~ 1/31/2011 7:20:29 PM ~ Bill:  Wyo medium correct institute:  2.5 million for overtime and additional utilites not in footnote 4 Supreme Court:  80,000 in admin budget, renewal of time study District 1a: converted position District 1b same thing Distric 1c - copier  Section ..monies for counties

1:16:44 ~ 1/31/2011 7:21:41 PM ~ After 160, insert UW medical budget so can change the footnote Section 205 Ed School finance, 15,000 school foundation money for campers added school foundation recalibration, program line will be underlined to take affects of recalibration

1:17:36 ~ 1/31/2011 7:22:32 PM ~ Bill:  Added board of midwifery,  052 and 054  added money

1:17:58 ~ 1/31/2011 7:22:55 PM ~ Von Flatern:  Pg 26, footnote 3, summer educational programs... went from 15 to 25,000.. do not remember the actions

1:18:26 ~ 1/31/2011 7:23:22 PM ~ Berger:  10,000 for the blind,  added, up to 25,000

1:18:41 ~ 1/31/2011 7:23:38 PM ~ Bill:  Capital Construction Section 3 Agency 6 Footnote 7 added, reversion from labs, can spend 200,000 for land scaping

1:19:39 ~ 1/31/2011 7:24:35 PM ~ Bill:  Agency 6 cap con, state building contingency,  added footnotes 4 and 5, 10,000 for long term study of gov mansion..added 200,000 to remodel gov mansion

1:20:22 ~ 1/31/2011 7:25:19 PM ~ Harshaman:  4 ..on the 10,000  discusssion?

1:20:37 ~ 1/31/2011 7:25:34 PM ~ Berger, Meier brought discussion,

1:21:02 ~ 1/31/2011 7:25:59 PM ~ Nicholas: ...

1:21:09 ~ 1/31/2011 7:26:05 PM ~ Berger:  For design of a possibility

1:21:27 ~ 1/31/2011 7:26:23 PM ~ Bill:  replenished accts..added safeway building, hathaway bldg renovation, afton armory rehab, worland armory rehab, utility upgrade, vet cemetary bridge..no footnote  Ag, footnoted for recovery via warranty claims  The rest underlined, project names should be underlined,  ...access, elk fence, wbs design, child program,, ..all programs underlined

1:23:00 ~ 1/31/2011 7:27:57 PM ~ Berger:  auto report back from attorney generals office?

1:23:14 ~ 1/31/2011 7:28:11 PM ~ Bill:  We have no ...

1:23:34 ~ 1/31/2011 7:28:31 PM ~ Berger:  Trust them

1:23:39 ~ 1/31/2011 7:28:36 PM ~ Bill:  Community college, casper college, special revenue money UW section 67 added footnotes to that footnote 2 specifies the FMR funding for joint facility Footnote 3 bonding Footnote 4 prohibits the use of sale proceeds of poplar facility  Next projection UW Sheridan college joint facility

1:24:42 ~ 1/31/2011 7:29:39 PM ~ Bill:  Section 300's:  need to add language Dollar amts change because need to transfer... Paragraph C added ...  Section 306.. medicaid..remove the limitation of 25 million ... added paragraph --intent to direct DFS and Health dept so ...6 month timeframe for accountability  Section ..244 out of 251 positions eliminated  Section 330:  library .. added 3 million  Local govts..added 35 million  Clarification of assessment...state lands interpreted..need to change 2009 to 2010..

1:27:38 ~ 1/31/2011 7:32:34 PM ~ Bill:   Berger: pg 35 data centers

1:28:19 ~ 1/31/2011 7:33:16 PM ~ billl:  datat center unsolved, need to finalize with co chairs

1:28:33 ~ 1/31/2011 7:33:30 PM ~ Nicholas:  email info, will print out and send

1:28:47 ~ 1/31/2011 7:33:44 PM ~ Bill:  Section 344   added  ..section 345 correction of double funding section 346 section 347 new AML funding Draft on Friday, overlooked UW issue, amending 2008 session laws, amended...... voted on it, it is in, will include in the offical draft  067 footnote on 3.5 million endowment challenge

1:30:40 ~ 1/31/2011 7:35:37 PM ~ Bill:  Section 348  LSO for salary money Section 349 new school cap con..underlined That is it..take us through sections 300 We have additional direction needed, need to clarify provisons in data center,  ..omitted language, copy of draft bill

1:31:41 ~ 1/31/2011 7:36:38 PM ~ Harshman"  pg 45....Middle of bottom paragraph, prior to expenditure ....commission shall report.... What does that mean?  Can't buy until they send us a letter

1:32:22 ~ 1/31/2011 7:37:19 PM ~ Bill:  yes

1:32:25 ~ 1/31/2011 7:37:22 PM ~ Harshman:  Do we reply back?

1:32:32 ~ 1/31/2011 7:37:29 PM ~ Bill:  just wanted to be contacted to be educated

1:32:46 ~ 1/31/2011 7:37:43 PM ~ Berger;  Military advise us by email

1:32:54 ~ 1/31/2011 7:37:51 PM ~ Harshman:  pg 47 Lincoln 1 and 2 down from that..words completion, phase 3 trying to speed up, may not be completed,, why does it say completed?

1:33:36 ~ 1/31/2011 7:38:33 PM ~ Berger:  language in original handout

1:33:45 ~ 1/31/2011 7:38:41 PM ~ Bill:  Best to check with Dave Nelson,

1:34:03 ~ 1/31/2011 7:39:00 PM ~ Meier:  Misprint... needs priority index at 233 or jumping over 150 schools

1:34:23 ~ 1/31/2011 7:39:19 PM ~ Harshman:

1:34:33 ~ 1/31/2011 7:39:29 PM ~ Bill: guessing not a misprint..also on page 45 Johnson 1 elementary school at 243 at top of page 45

1:35:04 ~ 1/31/2011 7:40:01 PM ~ berger: .. Harshman..good question

1:35:18 ~ 1/31/2011 7:40:14 PM ~ fMeier: design build 1 million ---10 million for construction...hwo do you make leap

1:35:39 ~ 1/31/2011 7:40:36 PM ~ Nicholas:  reson for it jumping up

1:35:47 ~ 1/31/2011 7:40:44 PM ~ Bill:  2010 needs index ,  priority different than sheet shown now

1:36:16 ~ 1/31/2011 7:41:12 PM ~ Meier:  one page explanation of how things got reshuffled

1:36:27 ~ 1/31/2011 7:41:24 PM ~ Berger:  can do the research and address it

1:36:46 ~ 1/31/2011 7:41:43 PM ~ Bill:  Matt has index

1:36:54 ~ 1/31/2011 7:41:51 PM ~ Von Flatern:  pg 35, section 343, numbers filled in tomorrow

1:37:15 ~ 1/31/2011 7:42:11 PM ~ Berger: correct

1:37:19 ~ 1/31/2011 7:42:16 PM ~ fHarshman:  Elementary school replacement ..number is 2009 needs.  For 2010 it has number 8

1:37:39 ~ 1/31/2011 7:42:36 PM ~ Nicholas:  Why forced to use old needs?

1:37:48 ~ 1/31/2011 7:42:44 PM ~ Berger:  why not updated needs index

1:37:56 ~ 1/31/2011 7:42:53 PM ~ Matt:  Subsection A - states using needs priority index used to complete biennial budget request..used ....for 2010 re-established...

1:38:52 ~ 1/31/2011 7:43:48 PM ~ Nicholas:  A cross-check so we can explain on the floor why 233 Johnson jumped so high

1:39:12 ~ 1/31/2011 7:44:08 PM ~ Matt:  In case of duplications in biennial budget request, would not show same priority being budgeted....does not appear ..Not two number 25's..finishing project in Lincoln county, has same number

1:40:09 ~ 1/31/2011 7:45:05 PM ~ Berger:  Cheat sheet should have index clearly stated

1:40:18 ~ 1/31/2011 7:45:15 PM ~ Matt; can provide corsswalk

1:40:25 ~ 1/31/2011 7:45:21 PM ~ Meier:  different needs index, same priority,, 9- 10 so have 21-9 21-10..do not have the same number,

1:40:52 ~ 1/31/2011 7:45:48 PM ~ Matt: does not matter to me..however you wan tit displayed, ease of comparing standard budget to supplemental budget

1:41:18 ~ 1/31/2011 7:46:15 PM ~ fNicholas:  Casper lumped together..

1:41:28 ~ 1/31/2011 7:46:25 PM ~ Harshman:  funded first phase...plannign money was in previous bieenium, how many phases, just selected architects,

1:41:56 ~ 1/31/2011 7:46:53 PM ~ Nicholas: all 3

1:42:00 ~ 1/31/2011 7:46:57 PM ~ Harshaman ; All 3, simultaneous..original est. around 115,

1:42:29 ~ 1/31/2011 7:47:26 PM ~ Nicholas: argument..over schools

1:42:39 ~ 1/31/2011 7:47:36 PM ~ Harshman:  We are schools of choice, so haggling..lot of discussion. Do know Roosevelt High School in 1920 bldg will get brand new stand alone bldg,  KW build, demolish,...NC will be renovate, swing space.. Concern of this body..can't build another frontier middle school like 8 yrs ago.being repurposed   do not know...one part of this 84 which is now 98.  build enough space to accomodate current enrollment, 5 yr projections

1:44:32 ~ 1/31/2011 7:49:29 PM ~ Nicholas:  Lump dollars together, instead of 3 amounts.  Bd of Trustees put full amount into KW..Is it okay to lump these together or should they be broken out and put a footnote on it that with someone's approval they can be moved around..whole 84 million on Natrona or KW and do not have enrollment captured

1:45:44 ~ 1/31/2011 7:50:41 PM ~ Harshman, will cost different amounts..  new, build, demolish same site, remodel.. .

1:46:13 ~ 1/31/2011 7:51:10 PM ~ Nicholas: original allocations did

1:46:21 ~ 1/31/2011 7:51:18 PM ~ Harshman:  a swag.. so I do not know  or say make sure....

1:46:36 ~ 1/31/2011 7:51:32 PM ~ Nicholas:  Break out into 3 projects the way they were,

1:46:53 ~ 1/31/2011 7:51:50 PM ~ Harshman:  Say this  money will be used to accomodate current enrollment.  Roosevelt fluctuates while NC and KW are within 100.  Roosevelt will take high tech, high end completer classes

1:47:44 ~ 1/31/2011 7:52:41 PM ~ Nicholas:  do not know answer, concern over lumping together

1:47:57 ~ 1/31/2011 7:52:54 PM ~ Nicholas:  Unravel and put the three projects together and then bring amendment on floor to shift projects We changed the recommendations.  Facility brought 3 projjects so should be broken out htat way Need approval oversight

1:48:45 ~ 1/31/2011 7:53:42 PM ~ Harshman:  Divide 84 by thirds and use flex language

1:48:57 ~ 1/31/2011 7:53:54 PM ~ Berger:  Go back to current handout and break into 3

1:49:11 ~ 1/31/2011 7:54:08 PM ~ Harshman:  allow flex language..will know more in 3 months

1:49:25 ~ 1/31/2011 7:54:21 PM ~ Nicholas:  48 for new, 16 and 20 If in three, commision has to approve

1:50:31 ~ 1/31/2011 7:55:27 PM ~ Harshman: Commission has to approve any spending Add the flex language here.  Commission will decide

1:51:00 ~ 1/31/2011 7:55:56 PM ~ Nicholas:  Break into 3 and propose flex language

1:51:13 ~ 1/31/2011 7:56:10 PM ~ Berger:  Bring back to Bill in the morning

1:51:24 ~ 1/31/2011 7:56:21 PM ~ Bill: IN the drafting system Berger:  Tentatively on adjournment tomorrow

1:51:46 ~ 1/31/2011 7:56:43 PM ~ Bill:  Possibly Wednesday

1:51:55 ~ 1/31/2011 7:56:52 PM ~ Berger:  Timing Schedule Bill:  Wednesday:

1:52:10 ~ 1/31/2011 7:57:07 PM ~