File name: JACSupplementalBudget2011-2012_20110202_163542.dcr

Folder: C:\Documents and Settings\HAppropriations\Desktop\Recordings

 

    0 ~ 2/2/2011 4:36:45 PM ~ JAC  Vote on the Budget Bill

    2 ~ 2/2/2011 4:36:48 PM ~ Bill:  Changes: 1.  pg 8  Footnote 6...moved the one at will position..new language 2.  pg 10  Addition to the state auditor's office,  footnotes 3 and 4 on page 11 Footnote 3:  90% language should have been talked about.  Committee's intent to attain a minimum of 90% .  Money added changed % to between 90 and 95% Out of A & I and into auditor's office

 2:03 ~ 2/2/2011 4:38:48 PM ~ Nicholas:  If not enough money to get to 90% ..give more, what is the mandate?  The word "to attain" might be the problem.

 2:34 ~ 2/2/2011 4:39:19 PM ~ Dave:   Bill:  Strike the 90%..as close as possible to market pay..believe money will be sufficent to reach 93%

 3:12 ~ 2/2/2011 4:39:58 PM ~ Nicholas:  What happens...concept is uniformity and highest level with these funds To obtain a uniform market pay, not in excess of 94%

 4:05 ~ 2/2/2011 4:40:51 PM ~ Pederson:  If cap it and it does not narrow it, does it affect people currently above the 90? Nicholas:  For purposes of market pay as outlined in the budget request or pay plan.  We know the pay plan Some judgement on that...for market pay as determined by..take the 90% out.

 5:28 ~ 2/2/2011 4:42:13 PM ~ Bill: 3:  pg 10 and 11 - employee insurance....moved to state auditor's office and footnote 4 covers that.  A& I direct the spending of them money by state auditor 4. pg 14  Line 4 add the words "subject to consultation with the Governor" 5.  pg 24  DOT monies   assume 40 million and 6 million were one time monies 6.  pg 26  Division of aging...original language..remove 400,000 out of the footnote..footnote  ten

 7:35 ~ 2/2/2011 4:44:21 PM ~ 7.  State aid pg 35  360 million reflects 6 million reduction transferred to state auditor 8.  pg 44  Pulling in agency 167, changing footnote from 16 to 20.

 8:18 ~ 2/2/2011 4:45:03 PM ~ Nicholas:  have they picked up those 4 seats... Bill:  Believe they have Berger: 13 alternates

 8:43 ~ 2/2/2011 4:45:28 PM ~ pg 55 minor change...current revenue projections pg 59  local govt distribution  lines 9, 11 assessed valuation ...2009 assessed valuation

 9:32 ~ 2/2/2011 4:46:17 PM ~ Bill:  pg 61  Data center   Nicholas:  Govs office and Verizon representative tried to push funding through business council or WYDOT..constitutional issues...provided as grants to cities, towns, counties, datat center...posted bond seeking repayment...go to romanette 2 - std language Gov may require a condition.. business council or WYDOT to oversee the funds Did you put in language ..consider impact on ..communitey

11:37 ~ 2/2/2011 4:48:22 PM ~ Dave:  pg 62  infrastructure beneficial to public.....

11:52 ~ 2/2/2011 4:48:37 PM ~ Nicholas:  Issue is if  money providing public benefit...early phases may be small.  This is the compromise

12:30 ~ 2/2/2011 4:49:15 PM ~ Bill:  Pg 73 ...Dave Nelson, School cap con

12:47 ~ 2/2/2011 4:49:32 PM ~ Dave:   Von Flatern:  clarify pg 61  Line 7 covered public necessity

13:11 ~ 2/2/2011 4:49:56 PM ~ Dave pg 62 line 7

13:22 ~ 2/2/2011 4:50:07 PM ~ Dave Nelson:  School facilities budget..clarified cap con project for natrona county high school projects...NC, KW and Roosevelt.... NC, KW  phase 1 last year and commences work on alternative high school and shared facility Paragraph 8 on page 81 clarifies. ....and ability to transfer money between these projects as necessary, conditioning on report to select school commission in monthly process

15:16 ~ 2/2/2011 4:52:02 PM ~ Nicholas:  saw language and said to go ahead.  When we take it to floor, will talk to Natrona Folks,,Casper and facility commission in-fighting

15:55 ~ 2/2/2011 4:52:41 PM ~ Von Flatern:  Line 3  necessary to complete selected remedies.  Are they selected yet?

16:14 ~ 2/2/2011 4:52:59 PM ~ Nicholas:  No...Casper ..flexibility to move.. Issue:  Can KW build larger to attract more students?  This proposal talks about modifying NC, KW and then not a third high school but a shared high school for technical and Roosevelt as an alternative high school

17:14 ~ 2/2/2011 4:53:59 PM ~ Von Flatern: ...agreeing with decision to havea center that other two high school will use, seperate buildings?

17:43 ~ 2/2/2011 4:54:29 PM ~ Nicholas:  Stand alone buildings....Roosevelt, Shared facility out by Wal-mart

18:14 ~ 2/2/2011 4:54:59 PM ~ Von Flatern:  My understanding was...shared building

18:25 ~ 2/2/2011 4:55:11 PM ~ Nicholas:  Roosevelt existing school....new building

18:39 ~ 2/2/2011 4:55:24 PM ~ Dave Nelson:  4 seperate buildings...

18:52 ~ 2/2/2011 4:55:37 PM ~ Von Flatern:  Originally 3 line items

19:02 ~ 2/2/2011 4:55:47 PM ~ Nelson:  original was called ..CAPS

19:14 ~ 2/2/2011 4:56:00 PM ~ Nicholas:  Two buildings on one line item

19:31 ~ 2/2/2011 4:56:16 PM ~ Von Flatern:  want selected rememdies to be what has already been selected

19:58 ~ 2/2/2011 4:56:43 PM ~ Nicholas:  Dave Nelson

20:05 ~ 2/2/2011 4:56:51 PM ~ Nelson:  my recollection is seperate...some discussion on line item placement seperate shared facility among KW, NC and Roosevelt..free standing

20:39 ~ 2/2/2011 4:57:24 PM ~ Von Flatern:  ?

20:44 ~ 2/2/2011 4:57:29 PM ~ Nicholas:  Remodel 3, build 1

20:54 ~ 2/2/2011 4:57:39 PM ~ Von Flatern:  Read it literally..4 buildings... .

21:22 ~ 2/2/2011 4:58:07 PM ~ Nciholas:  3 remodeled buildings, putting items in Roosevelt that go beyond alternative high school....

21:59 ~ 2/2/2011 4:58:44 PM ~ Nicholas:  selected remedies

22:07 ~ 2/2/2011 4:58:52 PM ~ Nelson:  Yes

22:14 ~ 2/2/2011 4:58:59 PM ~ Von Flatern:  like the word, existing Nicholas:  previouslyu selected remedies Nelson :  May I find out and come back what is your deadline?   Nicholas:  .. Von Flatern

23:14 ~ 2/2/2011 5:00:00 PM ~ Nicholas:  If not here, tough.  put in word previous

23:30 ~ 2/2/2011 5:00:15 PM ~ Steward ; repeat

23:36 ~ 2/2/2011 5:00:21 PM ~ fNicholas pg 81, line 3, after word the;  before selected; add the word previously.

24:05 ~ 2/2/2011 5:00:50 PM ~ Bill:  data center language Pg 82 is addition of omitted section 300 which changes the uranium center

24:27 ~ 2/2/2011 5:01:12 PM ~ Gruver:  pg 62  line 2 Data Center...they post the bond...if nto constructed in 3 years...what is intent, construction begun or not completed...start or completed

25:08 ~ 2/2/2011 5:01:53 PM ~ Nicholas:  Start

25:13 ~ 2/2/2011 5:01:58 PM ~ Bill: that is it

25:21 ~ 2/2/2011 5:02:06 PM ~ Nicholas:  Question Do Pass Roll call vote  Motion : Do Pass unanimous

26:09 ~ 2/2/2011 5:02:55 PM ~ fNicholas.  cheat sheets?

26:19 ~ 2/2/2011 5:03:05 PM ~ Bill:  Bill and cheat sheets

26:32 ~ 2/2/2011 5:03:17 PM ~ Staff:  Provide blank sheets for agencys that are still open... prep next week, budget the following week.