File name: JAC Budget hearings 2013_20121214_070844.dcr Folder: C:\Documents and Settings\happropriations\Desktop\JAC Hearings 2013 0 ~ 12/14/2012 8:01:49 AM ~ Start Recording 2 ~ 12/14/2012 8:01:50 AM ~ December 14, 2012 Friday Agency Hearings Supplemental Budger BFY 14/14 Department of Education 3:30 ~ 12/14/2012 8:05:18 AM ~ Berger Good Morning 3:40 ~ 12/14/2012 8:05:28 AM ~ Hill Fred Hansen, Don Drew We submitted a proposal during our meeting with JAC and they asked for some changes. In Oct. I met with our staff and asked that the 8% ... Positions were transfered from Education to DCIS (Reading of letter) Fred Hansen 8:07 ~ 12/14/2012 8:09:56 AM ~ Hansen Do you have the handout? Dept. submitted two budgets 005 & 205 This page you will see both agencies This will be 005 We will start with the We have two budgets 1.9 & 1.7 billion I put an astrick by the items that moved those items into the State Auditors office. We have the 8% proposed cut as requested by Gov. 11:21 ~ 12/14/2012 8:13:09 AM ~ Berger FRed I think we should just 11:36 ~ 12/14/2012 8:13:25 AM ~ Hansen First found on page 50 General Fund Budget Began with 8% cut Next Superintendent Office Full 8% cut and a slight increase Next Fininacing we took the 8% curt plus additional $8,200 cut What it does for us that we can live with it as is Reading Assessment That is the first restricted budget 13:53 ~ 12/14/2012 8:15:42 AM ~ Nicholas Page 18 The intital changes starting on page 7, does this relect all those changes 14:58 ~ 12/14/2012 8:16:47 AM ~ Berger When you to down that chart 15:08 ~ 12/14/2012 8:16:57 AM ~ Hansen Yes those changes on positions are reflected on page 7 That request was not requested by the gov Yes, that is the result of the B11 that was turned by the Gov The funds have not actually been moved For example If a person is in a federal program 17:06 ~ 12/14/2012 8:18:55 AM ~ Berger How do you coordinate with the Federal GOvernment 17:24 ~ 12/14/2012 8:19:12 AM ~ Hansen If a person is working full time in a federal program there is not problem If they are only working part time a .......... is used 18:12 ~ 12/14/2012 8:20:01 AM ~ Berger Is that on a Calander year or fiscal year? Have you drawn down those funds? 18:54 ~ 12/14/2012 8:20:43 AM ~ Hansen This particular year we were asked to move that into the B11 funding. A&I directed us to do that. 19:48 ~ 12/14/2012 8:21:37 AM ~ Meier 19:56 ~ 12/14/2012 8:21:44 AM ~ Bebout Just a procedural question When I look at this I see it as a different unit number. Is that how you track it. Do these move from one area to another. Is there a summary of these changes. You don't have to answer that today. I just want to be able to understand it better 22:03 ~ 12/14/2012 8:23:51 AM ~ Nicholas When you could ...... We want to be able to identify the state funds and fed. funds when employees are transfered around. 23:02 ~ 12/14/2012 8:24:51 AM ~ Hansen We had some issues we were able to use them in different areas. How do you determine when you have to come back to legislation and when you can change them yourself. You have position numbers There is a footnote in our budget 25:00 ~ 12/14/2012 8:26:49 AM ~ Nicholas Suppose a Special Ed program is created with 5 employees 25:25 ~ 12/14/2012 8:27:14 AM ~ Hansen The 25:33 ~ 12/14/2012 8:27:21 AM ~ Nicholas That's what I'm not understanding 25:58 ~ 12/14/2012 8:27:47 AM ~ Hill My understanding is that when I took over the office that ........ That is how I understand it works, is that right Fred. 26:58 ~ 12/14/2012 8:28:47 AM ~ Nicholas Were there 9 positions that needed realighned 27:23 ~ 12/14/2012 8:29:12 AM ~ Hill We followed A&I recommendation and were going to do that one by one. We did that by the B11 process 28:19 ~ 12/14/2012 8:30:08 AM ~ Nicholas You understand that the department that you will meet 28:49 ~ 12/14/2012 8:30:38 AM ~ Hill I understand this has been the practice by previous administrations. 29:27 ~ 12/14/2012 8:31:16 AM ~ Nicholas I don't know about old practices and new practices 30:09 ~ 12/14/2012 8:31:58 AM ~ Nicholas Are you going to be able to give us a list of what positions that have been realigned 30:42 ~ 12/14/2012 8:32:30 AM ~ Berger I am just trying to figure out how ......... 31:17 ~ 12/14/2012 8:33:06 AM ~ Hansen I would have to go back and look at that document 31:34 ~ 12/14/2012 8:33:23 AM ~ Berger How many of those have been reconciled. We worked on that during the whole session Realigning the funding 32:08 ~ 12/14/2012 8:33:57 AM ~ Hansen 32:18 ~ 12/14/2012 8:34:06 AM ~ Jones In you review of the information We identified 6 positions The sublimental request mirrors what what on the B11 that the gov. denied. We 33:12 ~ 12/14/2012 8:35:01 AM ~ Nicholas Suppose they got 10 positions in permitteing and 10 in enforcement O.K., we will do that within our existing staff. You wouldn't take it out of one unit and put it in another. I don't know what is happening here. Would you di 35:35 ~ 12/14/2012 8:37:24 AM ~ Hansen Our practices in the past As the agency prepares the budget you can see where the positions 36:22 ~ 12/14/2012 8:38:10 AM ~ Jones When we were looking at the B11 as a means of providing some background to the Governor. It's a reconciliation of the programs and the fiscal sides It does have an effect on the budget. When additional duties are put on an agency and they try to obsorb those duties. If they can't, they come to the legislation and ask for more positions. There are positions that are funding by a variity of sources. Where this broke down for us is exactly where you are now. 40:05 ~ 12/14/2012 8:41:54 AM ~ Nicholas Suppose we have 5 & 5 and no fiscal not. That would not be an agency....... If you say you are going to take civil lawers and move them to the criminal side. 41:33 ~ 12/14/2012 8:43:22 AM ~ Hansen When we do the B1 changes, we document it 41:55 ~ 12/14/2012 8:43:43 AM ~ Hill I apprecialte We are a service orinanted agency Not getting the work done is not an option. I am aware that we have one of the larger budgets. When we look 49:21 ~ 12/14/2012 8:51:10 AM ~ Hansen 49:39 ~ 12/14/2012 8:51:28 AM ~ Berger It was a program that you thought was beneficial I think that is when we thought that that That is when we started looking at the 50:35 ~ 12/14/2012 8:52:23 AM ~ Hill As I recall The Laramie Office was in part funded by. I moved them back home so they . Gov. Mead and I 1.2 mill was in special development. I wasn't sure that is where we needed to put the money. They wnated it from the state. We went in and negotiated. We had the 2.1 million coming back to the state. This will be the first administration where we will not be passing the debt on to the next administration. It was on Friday Nights and Saturdays. Through teacher to teacher anitiatives, that program has worked. SO that was not new. But because it was new to you all, We looked for her for 15 months. 54:53 ~ 12/14/2012 8:56:41 AM ~ Meier Were those general fund dollars. 55:11 ~ 12/14/2012 8:57:00 AM ~ Hansen There were 75% schoold foundation The 2.6% was from the foundation. 56:08 ~ 12/14/2012 8:57:57 AM ~ Meier using funds 56:19 ~ 12/14/2012 8:58:08 AM ~ Hansen the T to T program. Legislatue approved 56:44 ~ 12/14/2012 8:58:33 AM ~ Nicholas where approval 56:59 ~ 12/14/2012 8:58:47 AM ~ Hansen 57:10 ~ 12/14/2012 8:58:59 AM ~ Nichalos don't see any authorization 57:30 ~ 12/14/2012 8:59:19 AM ~ Hill part of discussion 57:57 ~ 12/14/2012 8:59:46 AM ~ Nicholas program funds would not be moved 58:13 ~ 12/14/2012 9:00:02 AM ~ Hansen moved funds 58:21 ~ 12/14/2012 9:00:10 AM ~ Nicholas prestnt to committee. had discussion 58:45 ~ 12/14/2012 9:00:34 AM ~ Hansen motion to move money, coreat T to T 59:07 ~ 12/14/2012 9:00:55 AM ~ Berger go with 59:17 ~ 12/14/2012 9:01:06 AM ~ Jones clarification separate unit amendment on senate floor; created budget; staff contacted budget division about error 1:00:19 ~ 12/14/2012 9:02:08 AM ~ Berger went form 1:00:31 ~ 12/14/2012 9:02:20 AM ~ Wallis footnote passed by legislature read; has it happened 1:01:22 ~ 12/14/2012 9:03:10 AM ~ Jones B 11 done; accounts restricted; b11 encoumberances on going effort; 1:02:02 ~ 12/14/2012 9:03:50 AM ~ Hill answer is yes it did occur. 250k; opinion agreed; cochairs of joint education committee; fiscal restraint; trying to move an education forward. pass along debt from previous 1:03:59 ~ 12/14/2012 9:05:47 AM ~ jones teacher to teacher program dept of audit perform audit. completed; follow-up action; recommendations; repayment of dollars; inappropriate spending that occurred. may lead to additional 1:05:29 ~ 12/14/2012 9:07:17 AM ~ Hill clarification of inappropriate; very few questionable 1:06:15 ~ 12/14/2012 9:08:03 AM ~ Nicholas meet obligation of footnote; jem process 1:06:39 ~ 12/14/2012 9:08:28 AM ~ Hansen audit found all appropriate expenditures. 3 questionable items moved 1:07:21 ~ 12/14/2012 9:09:10 AM ~ Nichalos vouchers showing 1:07:31 ~ 12/14/2012 9:09:20 AM ~ Hill they have come out of the codes. followed narrative. not misappropriated. reversions in almost all; mo money to pay back 1:08:19 ~ 12/14/2012 9:10:07 AM ~ Jones looking at it. unit 6104 question payroll. 6104 6105, others 1:09:12 ~ 12/14/2012 9:11:00 AM ~ Steward looking in budget 20 plus positions wanting to move; 70 plus positions. how many positions effected 1:10:02 ~ 12/14/2012 9:11:51 AM ~ Hansen number is something like 27 or 28 1:10:25 ~ 12/14/2012 9:12:14 AM ~ Steward level of scrutiny 110 positions. effort to align positions; do we have a problem. are we seeing a realignment 1:11:51 ~ 12/14/2012 9:13:40 AM ~ Hill both are true. not unusual in agency; in alignment with feds; continual changes on federal level. 1:13:06 ~ 12/14/2012 9:14:54 AM ~ Steward Can bret respont to my question; are we seeing a 10 - 15 % chifting 1:13:40 ~ 12/14/2012 9:15:29 AM ~ Jones may occur in other agencies with a few positions, not as extensive as this; acknowledge it and seek approval; cases may occur in other agencies; ETS and transition, keeping up with transition; 1:15:29 ~ 12/14/2012 9:17:18 AM ~ Steward Give us a good overview of why you 1:15:52 ~ 12/14/2012 9:17:41 AM ~ Hill Invited legislatures in June 2011. need to look at budget. come in in August; legislative process first diays in office - transition, accountability, no HR person. repurpose 3 instructional people. worked with HR director. compliance piece; learning piece; looking for people to serve in positions. accountability piece; being reconfigured; assessment division working; outreach people in Fremont count 1:19:40 ~ 12/14/2012 9:21:29 AM ~ Steward scurtiny inability to answer very simple questions; how many positions 1:20:24 ~ 12/14/2012 9:22:13 AM ~ Hill 29 positions 1:20:34 ~ 12/14/2012 9:22:22 AM ~ Berger 1:20:52 ~ 12/14/2012 9:22:40 AM ~ Hanson Page 7 shows position moving out of negative number; 29 total positions; accounting shows 1:22:11 ~ 12/14/2012 9:24:00 AM ~ Berger walk us through it 1:22:23 ~ 12/14/2012 9:24:12 AM ~ Hanson b1 funding 71,000 portion of posion 106; Page 8 position split; a&I prepared table 1:23:31 ~ 12/14/2012 9:25:20 AM ~ Berger 1:23:41 ~ 12/14/2012 9:25:30 AM ~ Steward looking at 300 people 1:24:22 ~ 12/14/2012 9:26:11 AM ~ Jones add comment; defined process well defined. job descriptions; big part; awareness of defined proceses 1:25:16 ~ 12/14/2012 9:27:04 AM ~ Berger 10 minute break back at 1:25:38 ~ 12/14/2012 9:27:26 AM ~ Berger still on position movement. work on accountability piece; what happened with B11 process. how many positions federal 1:47:03 ~ 12/14/2012 9:48:51 AM ~ Hansen Accountability included in report; 1:47:22 ~ 12/14/2012 9:49:11 AM ~ Berger accountability portion 1:47:37 ~ 12/14/2012 9:49:26 AM ~ Hill Accountability was on federal level. staff person dedicated; one of 29 partially funded with GF 1:48:25 ~ 12/14/2012 9:50:14 AM ~ Berger realignment of all state government; where do you stand 1:48:54 ~ 12/14/2012 9:50:42 AM ~ Hill current on job desc 1:49:06 ~ 12/14/2012 9:50:55 AM ~ Harper updating positions accuracy of positions, compensation 1:49:47 ~ 12/14/2012 9:51:36 AM ~ Berger responsible 1:49:59 ~ 12/14/2012 9:51:48 AM ~ Harper 1:50:18 ~ 12/14/2012 9:52:07 AM ~ Berger federal portion other ques 1:50:33 ~ 12/14/2012 9:52:22 AM ~ Hill 1:50:39 ~ 12/14/2012 9:52:28 AM ~ Wallis dexcribe slip program 1:50:58 ~ 12/14/2012 9:52:47 AM ~ Hill special ed literacy program question again 1:51:35 ~ 12/14/2012 9:53:24 AM ~ Wallis long discussion; legislature actions; new program no legislative authority; teacher development at local level; budget bill footnote transfered funds; looks like programs ; how they were started; overview 1:53:25 ~ 12/14/2012 9:55:14 AM ~ Hill clarification. program tangible; teacher to teacher iniative; reading first; read 180; methololgy; consultants; t to t special education provided on state standards; common core state standards; relation to common core; implementation; support for implementation of common core of state standards. funding 1:56:29 ~ 12/14/2012 9:58:18 AM ~ Steele special ed funding; technical assistance; funds set aside; training special ed teachers; prefessional development; literacy; 1:57:50 ~ 12/14/2012 9:59:39 AM ~ Lynn state level assistance; deliver support state assessment and standards; 1:58:39 ~ 12/14/2012 10:00:28 AM ~ Wallis webpage general education 200 stipen 1:59:13 ~ 12/14/2012 10:01:01 AM ~ Lynn intervention model special education students include all; consider response intervention; all people in school responsible for special education; regular teachers 2:00:48 ~ 12/14/2012 10:02:36 AM ~ Wallis who facilitates events 2:01:00 ~ 12/14/2012 10:02:49 AM ~ Lynn who actually goes out on the road;major role; expert teachers talking to other teachers; key facilator; not static 2:02:27 ~ 12/14/2012 10:04:15 AM ~ Harshmann who are they; how much they get paid 2:02:54 ~ 12/14/2012 10:04:43 AM ~ Lynn people under contract 2:03:06 ~ 12/14/2012 10:04:55 AM ~ Harshmann list of names; gave example of 27 year teacher from Douglas; have an example 2:03:58 ~ 12/14/2012 10:05:47 AM ~ Berger 2:04:07 ~ 12/14/2012 10:05:56 AM ~ Harshmenn lot to 200 dollar parments. anyone attending special ed credit 2:04:41 ~ 12/14/2012 10:06:30 AM ~ Hill don't just walk in and get 200 dollars. thousands not being paid. who gets paid 2:05:45 ~ 12/14/2012 10:07:33 AM ~ Berger 200 stipen 2:05:53 ~ 12/14/2012 10:07:41 AM ~ Lynn when teachers do extension work; applied in classroom; done research; 5-7 hours of additional work $200 stipen. Participants doing training; teachers joining in to do training; $200 stipen for extension work at Natrona Co High School; other contract type - common core rollout; deliver instruction to participants paid a stipen; how much have we paid a person. 2:09:32 ~ 12/14/2012 10:11:20 AM ~ Berger go back to Rep Wallis 2:09:45 ~ 12/14/2012 10:11:34 AM ~ Harshmann folks attending multiple sessions 2:10:06 ~ 12/14/2012 10:11:55 AM ~ Lynn some attending two. spring paws assessment; focus last spring; common core training; focus of instruction; depends on need and change of assessment; 2:11:21 ~ 12/14/2012 10:13:09 AM ~ Berger Rep edmonds 2:11:36 ~ 12/14/2012 10:13:25 AM ~ Edmonds teacher to teacher training 2:11:53 ~ 12/14/2012 10:13:41 AM ~ Lynn t to t l are teachers joining up 2:12:15 ~ 12/14/2012 10:14:03 AM ~ Edmonds came to appropriations to buiild teacher to teacher; is it the same thing 2:12:49 ~ 12/14/2012 10:14:37 AM ~ Hill literacy statewide focus; PLC iin school. independent work 2:13:24 ~ 12/14/2012 10:15:13 AM ~ Edmonds you knew should we go 2:13:53 ~ 12/14/2012 10:15:42 AM ~ Hill state board addopted common core, professional development not to have Dept. of Ed. Teqchers willing to join other teachers. Are we not to be working with districts 2:15:21 ~ 12/14/2012 10:17:09 AM ~ Edmonds did you think to ask it is a big issue, right to do 2:15:47 ~ 12/14/2012 10:17:36 AM ~ Hill line of thinking. common core; budget cuts; requirements to fullfill; federal and state requirements; how do we do it responsib 2:17:04 ~ 12/14/2012 10:18:53 AM ~ Edmons SPLIT common core 2:17:39 ~ 12/14/2012 10:19:28 AM ~ Hill state standards 2:17:55 ~ 12/14/2012 10:19:44 AM ~ Harshmann 200 dollar stipen; name and number; last bienium paid from special development; see more $200 stipens with special ed. same funding source 2:19:18 ~ 12/14/2012 10:21:07 AM ~ Hill special education teachers eligable for stipen. no new approach.Still new to mel maybe we should go to funmding 2:20:24 ~ 12/14/2012 10:22:12 AM ~ Lynn training funding from intent of training; some of $200 payments for standards review; Page 6. 2:21:37 ~ 12/14/2012 10:23:26 AM ~ Harshmann all were paid--looks like same funding source; paying person &37,000 2:22:42 ~ 12/14/2012 10:24:30 AM ~ Hill staff person took sabatical. She is a teacher working on special education benefit. 2:23:49 ~ 12/14/2012 10:25:37 AM ~ Harshman We need to see when, what was provided This seems too fuzzy and too imposible 2:24:33 ~ 12/14/2012 10:26:22 AM ~ Hill We welcome this type of direction. It was very very expensive. That has changed 2:25:17 ~ 12/14/2012 10:27:05 AM ~ Harshman I won't burn any more committee time. It is hard for us to understand this without more detail. 2:26:02 ~ 12/14/2012 10:27:50 AM ~ Hill I have a big concern about the amount of money being spent. The Special Ed coordinator now resides on the second floor of the Hathaway Bldg. 2:26:58 ~ 12/14/2012 10:28:46 AM ~ Wallis In light of the information that has already been requested. I still don't see how this is any different from the previous program. Hho were the facilitators, were there people from the state office, how much money was spent. Obviously more than special ed is being discussed. Are we risking fed money by discussing more topics. Why is this not Dept. of Ed just handing out Christmas bonuses. 2:30:10 ~ 12/14/2012 10:31:59 AM ~ Hill When ...... I was a tremendous amount ..... There are thousand of teachers who are not compensated for any of the meetings they attend 2:31:44 ~ 12/14/2012 10:33:32 AM ~ Berger Are there staff memebers here that are a part of this program. 2:32:18 ~ 12/14/2012 10:34:07 AM ~ Lynn The 29 positions I will get back to you on that. 2:32:52 ~ 12/14/2012 10:34:41 AM ~ Harshman Request for information I would like a list of those who have received a stimpin Are there non-teachers that are receiving these stypins? I am assuming that we are not These are my 4 questions 2:34:58 ~ 12/14/2012 10:36:46 AM ~ Meier Need a history of methodology The District went to seminars and then come back and share with counter parts. I recall these were extremely junketts. Now is a colamrotive effert. Now it is teachers working with teachers The stipan is less than what teachers get as regular salary. What I understand is that the model you are working with or towards. 2:38:34 ~ 12/14/2012 10:40:23 AM ~ Hill I smile That is exactly what is happening. We do have professional facilitators. You are exactly right, that is what we are attempting to do 2:40:05 ~ 12/14/2012 10:41:54 AM ~ Harshman 2:40:34 ~ 12/14/2012 10:42:22 AM ~ Hill The top down is by nature because of the statutes Have you done this, have you done that. Now we have more practicianors. We actual have people call us and want us to come and help them. I hasn't been that way for a very long time. We had 2:42:34 ~ 12/14/2012 10:44:22 AM ~ Meier There are some costs incurred this. Do you think the junket model is more expensive. 2:43:20 ~ 12/14/2012 10:45:09 AM ~ Hill Previoulsy is cost 2.4 mil, now XXX thousands. 2:43:55 ~ 12/14/2012 10:45:44 AM ~ Meier You can't get the results 2:44:37 ~ 12/14/2012 10:46:26 AM ~ Hill Right now we will be measured by ACT tests. This is to help impliment the common core 2:45:19 ~ 12/14/2012 10:47:07 AM ~ Meier I understand the common core. 2:45:41 ~ 12/14/2012 10:47:29 AM ~ Hill SPecial Ed is very dear to my heart. 2:46:01 ~ 12/14/2012 10:47:49 AM ~ Lynn We have a couple of ways of getting that information. We are very positive. Scores have improved The numbers of schools because of that subgroup have declined I know that this partnership has improved resuts There are common core standards. So right now, that is what we are working on. There is lot of colabatory work. They are out there sharing those core values. I think there is evidence to proves the effert 2:49:45 ~ 12/14/2012 10:51:33 AM ~ Meier How much .... and so are some schools coming up to that thresehold 2:50:46 ~ 12/14/2012 10:52:34 AM ~ Hill That is a layered questions We didn't see any change when admins changed. Now that I am Super. we ask for a freezing of our AMO's I guess you could say..... I would say to you we are on that path. Some say this will be gone so..... We will be ready with a new model very soon. This time next year I will be able to tell you, I don't have that info now. I would be happy to show that information now 2:54:18 ~ 12/14/2012 10:56:07 AM ~ Berger All the other acynims we are learning today. We went through the GEM process Particulary if it pertains to some of those postions that have been realigned 2:55:54 ~ 12/14/2012 10:57:43 AM ~ Berger I would like to get Mr. Hansen back here. 2:56:27 ~ 12/14/2012 10:58:16 AM ~ Hansen We left off on page 28 The superintendant restored the 8% reduction Page 32 Restricted budget Page 35 Quality Suplemental request Page 38 School Improvements minor change Page 5114 If there Page 43 Health and proposed position Gov denied Page 48 Proposed 8% reduction Page 3:00:23 ~ 12/14/2012 11:02:12 AM ~ Jones In November dialog about 400 series 3 of those position in 3 different units In this case we need to follow up with agency . We need 6117 is the unit we don't have emough detail 3:01:54 ~ 12/14/2012 11:03:42 AM ~ Richards I agree with Bret They are proposing returning a portion of those funds bu we don't 3:02:29 ~ 12/14/2012 11:04:17 AM ~ Hill We would welcome that 3:02:44 ~ 12/14/2012 11:04:33 AM ~ Jones I will point out the other 3 when we arrive at them 3:03:05 ~ 12/14/2012 11:04:54 AM ~ Hansen We will go into detail with that Page 50 Special Ed Monitoring 3:04:26 ~ 12/14/2012 11:06:15 AM ~ Hansen P 63 budget cut jac addl cuts in column 6 ; Page 58 budget proposed cut restored. 3:06:08 ~ 12/14/2012 11:07:57 AM ~ Jones Page 57 Contested IT position 3:06:36 ~ 12/14/2012 11:08:25 AM ~ Hansen career tecnical education Cut restored by Governor; Page 63 state vocational finance; Page 66 Page 69 IT support services 8% cut plus 10% cut positions cut 3:08:48 ~ 12/14/2012 11:10:37 AM ~ Jones page 68 It 3:09:03 ~ 12/14/2012 11:10:52 AM ~ Hansen Page 73 School foundation budget P 75 Tuition resources IT consolidation of one dollar 3:10:04 ~ 12/14/2012 11:11:52 AM ~ Jones Dollar so it would show up in print 3:10:33 ~ 12/14/2012 11:12:22 AM ~ Hansen P 77 Gov review and restored Jones another affected unit P80 3re restored budget P 83 JAC & governor funding should not be affected 3:12:22 ~ 12/14/2012 11:14:11 AM ~ Jones 4 position on page 80 3:12:36 ~ 12/14/2012 11:14:25 AM ~ Meier why do we use GF not school 3:12:56 ~ 12/14/2012 11:14:45 AM ~ Hansen Tribal schools not eligigle 3:13:24 ~ 12/14/2012 11:15:13 AM ~ Bebout BIA contract school 3:13:50 ~ 12/14/2012 11:15:39 AM ~ Meier definition; 3:14:18 ~ 12/14/2012 11:16:07 AM ~ Hansen school foundation funds 3:14:39 ~ 12/14/2012 11:16:27 AM ~ Hansen ends all issues with 8% cuts. Proposed positions; 3:15:35 ~ 12/14/2012 11:17:24 AM ~ Berger don't need to review 3:15:47 ~ 12/14/2012 11:17:36 AM ~ Hansen Agency 305 school foundation; largest state budget no supplemental budget; Page 13 205 ETIS concludes our budget 3:17:24 ~ 12/14/2012 11:19:13 AM ~ Perkins 205 at bottom 100 million. are the GF 3:18:01 ~ 12/14/2012 11:19:50 AM ~ Hansen 205 is all school foundation funds 3:18:16 ~ 12/14/2012 11:20:05 AM ~ Esquibel school safety; update 3:18:42 ~ 12/14/2012 11:20:30 AM ~ Wigert received 250,000 for school safety. grant process, implemented 11 of13 awards; awards in school districts. Technical assistance provided. % $50,000 vendor anti bullying 3:21:02 ~ 12/14/2012 11:22:51 AM ~ Esquibel how many tips 3:21:14 ~ 12/14/2012 11:23:03 AM ~ Wigert turned up heat; proactive 3:21:55 ~ 12/14/2012 11:23:43 AM ~ Esquibel another potential suscide attempt 10 yr boy 3:22:21 ~ 12/14/2012 11:24:10 AM ~ Hill Thank you 3:22:50 ~ 12/14/2012 11:24:39 AM ~ Wallis received report on useage of state plane. DOE second largest user. costs 3:23:34 ~ 12/14/2012 11:25:23 AM ~ Hill 3:23:45 ~ 12/14/2012 11:25:33 AM ~ Lane use of state fund divided 3:24:27 ~ 12/14/2012 11:26:16 AM ~ Wallis provide report what you used the state plane for; are the trips combined; example of typical trip 3:25:34 ~ 12/14/2012 11:27:22 AM ~ Hill state board meeting in Teton county. looked at funding. elimi8nate 2 overnight stays. balance out costs. Is it most cost effective? fiscal responsible 3:27:14 ~ 12/14/2012 11:29:02 AM ~ Wallis how is usage of plane vs previous 3:27:37 ~ 12/14/2012 11:29:26 AM ~ Hill my vehicle has significant mileage from statewide travel 3:28:13 ~ 12/14/2012 11:30:02 AM ~ Berger others 3:28:20 ~ 12/14/2012 11:30:09 AM ~ Harshmann are the trips planned out. what are ther next 3:28:49 ~ 12/14/2012 11:30:38 AM ~ Hill make a number of round trips. 3:29:51 ~ 12/14/2012 11:31:40 AM ~ Harshmann 76 flights 3:30:04 ~ 12/14/2012 11:31:52 AM ~ Hill not possible; may be number of passengers 3:30:32 ~ 12/14/2012 11:32:21 AM ~ Harshmann 3:30:42 ~ 12/14/2012 11:32:30 AM ~ Hill will propably read about it 3:31:02 ~ 12/14/2012 11:32:51 AM ~ Wallis number of legs. 3:31:24 ~ 12/14/2012 11:33:13 AM ~ Hill significantly lower number 3:31:47 ~ 12/14/2012 11:33:35 AM ~ Wallis aeronautics flight log 3:32:01 ~ 12/14/2012 11:33:50 AM ~ Berger 3:32:05 ~ 12/14/2012 11:33:53 AM ~ Bebout clear up what programs boutht into by legislature. process works 3:33:20 ~ 12/14/2012 11:35:08 AM ~ HJansen information beginning teacher pay, aids, 3:33:47 ~ 12/14/2012 11:35:36 AM ~ Berger hand out number 9. 3:34:11 ~ 12/14/2012 11:36:00 AM ~ Hansen committee status on sequestration. 3:34:54 ~ 12/14/2012 11:36:43 AM ~ berger not stamped in 3:35:07 ~ 12/14/2012 11:36:56 AM ~ Ed employee budgetr cliff. do not know outcome . est of cuts 7-10 %. Forward funding; letter in july, cuts not out of funds forward funding preliminary cuts based on what was awarded 9% on third page Immpact aid funds. 3:38:34 ~ 12/14/2012 11:40:23 AM ~ Berger back to document 3:39:25 ~ 12/14/2012 11:41:14 AM ~ cicarelli salary data browken down refinements clarrification on fed funded positions exempted District staff levels state level review, variations model comparisons teachers of non-record libarians, not certified staff FTE model difference Attachment 2 starting teacher salaries model average salary starting, no additional exp district hiring at higher level 3:44:39 ~ 12/14/2012 11:46:28 AM ~ Nicholas 3:44:44 ~ 12/14/2012 11:46:33 AM ~ Meier on 1 and 2. can we drill down 3:45:13 ~ 12/14/2012 11:47:01 AM ~ Cicarelli would have to look at it 3:45:27 ~ 12/14/2012 11:47:15 AM ~ Meier if we can drill down to elementary- bentificial to ...big difference between model average salaries. economy of scale. 3:46:54 ~ 12/14/2012 11:48:43 AM ~ Cicarelli Laramie 1 model based on 2005 data. adjustment 3:47:38 ~ 12/14/2012 11:49:27 AM ~ Meier laramie gets an adjuctment 3:47:53 ~ 12/14/2012 11:49:42 AM ~ Matt all school districts get 3:48:18 ~ 12/14/2012 11:50:07 AM ~ Meier 3:48:29 ~ 12/14/2012 11:50:18 AM ~ Matt 3:48:35 ~ 12/14/2012 11:50:24 AM ~ Meier need to look at cost adjustment. can't understand 3:49:19 ~ 12/14/2012 11:51:07 AM ~ Matt wyo cost of living index laramie co school district is lower 3:49:54 ~ 12/14/2012 11:51:42 AM ~ Maier thank you 3:50:04 ~ 12/14/2012 11:51:53 AM ~ Matt each school adopts district wide salary 3:50:30 ~ 12/14/2012 11:52:19 AM ~ Hansen percentages can be found on page 3:51:15 ~ 12/14/2012 11:53:04 AM ~ Nicholas cambell, laramie 1 182 positions under reported Natrona Like matt ... Model clearly fafored smaller schools. have we created a model migrating to larger school districts. does the model generate more thanthey need. Freemont 14 shows outlyer 37 more poseitions than modeled for 3:54:09 ~ 12/14/2012 11:55:58 AM ~ Hansen Impact aid from federal govt 3:54:31 ~ 12/14/2012 11:56:20 AM ~ Richards BIA adjustment 3:55:17 ~ 12/14/2012 11:57:06 AM ~ Hill example of plane issue. took plane to casper, rock springts, jackson, casper, cheyenne. 6 leg trip. thani you for the question 3:56:31 ~ 12/14/2012 11:58:20 AM ~ VonFlatern report had 20 hours 3:56:48 ~ 12/14/2012 11:58:36 AM ~ Berger Thank you very much Merry Christmas 3:57:09 ~ 12/14/2012 11:58:58 AM ~ Berger return at 1 p.m. Thank you 3:57:43 ~ 12/14/2012 11:59:31 AM ~ 4:06:42 ~ 12/14/2012 12:08:30 PM ~ Pause 4:06:42 ~ 12/14/2012 12:46:57 PM ~ Stop Recording