|
Wyoming Department of Education
State Superintendent: Judy Catchpole
Phone: (307) 777-7675
Fax: (307) 777-6234
E-mail: jcatch@educ.state.wy.us
Technology Contact: Linda Carter
Phone: (307) 777-6252
Fax: (307) 777-6234
E-mail: lcarter@educ.state.wy.us
Cover art by: Pame Hickman, Wyoming Department of Education
Wyoming Technology in Education Panel |
| Panel Members*: | ||
|---|---|---|
| Mark Antrim | Stan Bader | Ed Bales |
| Chuck Bayne | Sue Belish | Rob Bernard |
| Jack Bottenfield | Lesley Boughton | Dianne Bramwell |
| Jo Campbell | Steve Ellenbecker | Julie Gillett |
| Marshall Gingery | Joyce Gould | Brian Greene |
| David Haas | James Hageman | Ginny Harmelink |
| Darlene Hartman-Hallam | Gloria Hedderman | Marie Kalness |
| Robert Lemming | Robert Lonzo | George Mathes |
| Edward McCarthy | Larry Nash | Nell Pederson |
| Greg Ray | Bruce Snyder | Jim Starr |
| Terry Statton | Larry Stolz | Richard Strahorn |
| Denise Staley | Dave Swanson | Nick Testi |
| Nedalyn Testolin | Jan Truchot | Becky Underwood |
| Adell VanPatten-Gorney | Jerome Winter | Gail Zimmerman |
| Alan Sheinker | Tina Carroll | Linda Carter |
| Birney Holberg | ||
| State Plan Sub-Committee Members: | ||
| Mark Antrim | Stan Bader | Ed Bales |
| Chuck Bayne | Sue Belish | Jack Bottenfield |
| Dianne Bramwell | Steve Ellenbecker | Julie Gillett |
| Darlene Hartman-Hallam | Marie Kalness | Robert Lemming |
| Nell Pederson | Greg Ray | Terry Statton |
| Nedalyn Testolin | Adell VanPatten-Gorney | Alan Sheinker |
| Linda Carter | ||
| State Plan Writers: | ||
| Mark Antrim | Ed Bales | Sue Belish |
| Jo Campbell | Julie Gillett | Marshall Gingery |
| Joyce Gould | David Haas | Darlene Hartman-Hallam |
| Thomas Henry | Marie Kalness | George Mathes |
| Jim Starr | Jan Truchot | Tina Carroll |
| Linda Carter | Birney Holberg | Larry Stolz |
| Adell VanPatten-Gorney | ||
| *See Appendix A for a detailed listing. | ||
|
The people of Wyoming will work together to guarantee equal access to and availability of technologies that achieve improved learning and higher quality of life for all citizens.
|
The Technology in Education Panel respectfully submits this Wyoming Educational Technology Plan with optimism for the future of Wyoming's citizens. The Panel represents a broad spectrum of Wyoming's educational entities, including: teachers, school boards, communities, libraries, state agencies, businesses, and citizens. This Panel has devoted over a year to gathering information pertaining to educational technology from numerous broad-based resources. The purpose of this exhaustive data collection effort was to clearly identify all options available to Wyoming as it went about developing a comprehensive statewide plan for schools to access and effectively utilize educational technology.
The Wyoming Educational Technology Plan represents a culmination of this Panel's work. As such the plan is organized into several sections. First, a brief overview of the structure of the educational system in Wyoming is provided. Included in this background section is a description of the context within which this educational system is currently operating following a recent Supreme Court case and other legislative actions. Concluding this background section is a summary of key developments and efforts pertaining to educational technology which are currently underway in Wyoming. Such efforts have come in the form of: grassroots efforts, federal programs, Goals 2000, the Telecommunications Council, Wyoming's Strategic Direction for Information Technology, the Wyoming State Leased Network, and the Universal Service Fund.
The remainder of this document focuses on the future vision for technology in education in Wyoming. Specifically, this Wyoming Educational Technology Plan identifies technology needs, defines infrastructure requirements, articulates goals for educational technology in Wyoming schools and discusses the strategies that the Panel has identified as necessary for achieving these goals.
It is our belief that such a comprehensive, statewide plan is critical to the development of learners of all ages who are capable of creatively, effectively, and efficiently utilizing information technology tools. Developing these skills in our citizens will accelerate Wyoming's economic growth, expand opportunities for our best students to remain in this great state, and improve the quality of life for all of our citizens.
Wyoming's educational entities -- the University of Wyoming, Community College System, Department of Education, and the school districts -- have adopted a cooperative approach to achieving this new paradigm for learning. This cooperative spirit and interdependence will allow for a pooling of resources that will efficiently enable Wyoming's schools and classrooms to be equipped with the best possible information tools. Such tools will electronically link our classrooms to information resources worldwide. A premise upon which this Plan rests is the belief that Wyoming schools should be the forerunners in bringing the information age to all citizens of Wyoming. Our classrooms should become the centers for connected learning communities accessible to all Wyoming citizens.
In addition, an underlying assumption of this Plan is the view that merely teaching people to make use of technological tools is not enough. Rather, we must empower educators to weave information technologies into the fabric of a robust and creative curriculum. To achieve this requires that we adopt systematic professional development strategies and that we acknowledge the fact that educators cannot be transformed without adequate time and training to develop the required skills and perspectives. We must commit to developing teachers who are as comfortable with technological learning tools as they are with books and chalkboards.
In order to: 1) assure a high level of collaboration between
educational entities; 2) guarantee access to information technology
on a statewide basis; and 3) integrate such technology into our
teaching and learning, the following strategies are recommended:
|
The Wyoming Educational Technology Plan is designed to address more than the technical issues of planning, designing, and implementing technology in our educational institutions. It defines the direction for the use of technology for Wyoming's educational system. This plan is also intended to help educators develop an understanding of the issues related to statewide technology planning and implementation.
Technology is changing the face of education in our nation. It is important to realize that such technology creates both educational opportunities and challenges for Wyoming citizens. Technology cannot be viewed as a panacea to the educational system, rather, it should be viewed as a means to an end. That is, in order to effectively integrate technology into the curriculum, the focus must first be on the individual learner and their needs. Once these needs have been identified, curriculum and technology can follow. The positive benefits of technology will be realized so long as the focus remains on technology as a tool for learning.
Planning is absolutely essential to maximizing the positive benefits which can be derived from educational technology. The process of planning necessitates that goals be articulated and clearly specifies why a given technology would be the wisest and best choice to help achieve such goals. Again, it is important to keep the end in mind when selecting the means.
Moreover, technology planning, implementation and evaluation does not occur in separate, discrete stages. Rather, such activities are ongoing and may often occur simultaneously. Feedback obtained during implementation, and/or from preliminary evaluation results, will often require that technology plans be revised. Since technology planning efforts are never finished, there will always be opportunities to improve and strengthen the plan. This Wyoming Educational Technology Plan represents a launching point from which such ongoing efforts can proceed.
|
When looking at the state's education initiatives, a basic understanding of the K-12 and post-secondary governance structures is essential. This section will focus on the structure of the educational system, the Wyoming Supreme Court decision in "Campbell County School District, et al., vs. State of Wyoming, et. al.", and key technological developments currently underway in Wyoming.
Wyoming, with its 98,000 square miles, is the ninth largest state in area. With fewer than 500,000 citizens, however, Wyoming ranks lowest in population. This sparse population spread across great distances creates unique challenges for education in Wyoming.
Wyoming's educational system encompasses 48 school districts, a Community College System comprised of seven community colleges, and one university. There are three state boards and 55 local boards of education.
The Wyoming Department of Education (WDE) and the
State Board of Education (SBE) oversee the K-12 educational system
in Wyoming. The WDE is headed by a State Superintendent of Public
Instruction, who is one of five elected state officials. The
Superintendent serves as an ex officio member of the SBE -- a
governor appointed body for which the Deputy Superintendent also
serves as a liaison. Responsibilities of the State Board of
Education that relate to this Wyoming Educational Technology Plan
include the following:
Each of the 48 school districts are governed by local boards of education comprised of locally elected trustees. These boards are assigned powers and duties and set policies for the management and operation of their individual school districts.
The Wyoming Community College System consists of
the Community College Commission and seven colleges. The Community
College Commission has seven members appointed by the Governor. The
Governor and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction also
serve as non-voting members on this Commission. Statute requires
the Commission to "promulgate and adopt rules and regulations
that ensure the operation and maintenance of the community college
system in a coordinated, efficient, and effective manner."
Specifically, responsibilities of the Commission include:
Each college is governed by a separate board of trustees. The seven locally elected boards of trustees are assigned specific powers and duties and set policies for the management and operation of their individual college districts. Community college districts are defined by service areas (see Appendix B for a map of community college districts).
The management of the University of Wyoming is placed with a Board of Trustees, whose powers and responsibilities are prescribed by the legislature. These responsibilities are based on both constitutional and statutory requirements, as well as general expectations regarding the operation of the University of Wyoming. The Board consists of 12 members who are appointed by the Governor. The Governor and the State Superintendent of Public Instruction also serve as non-voting members of the Board.In summary, there are several levels of governmental units responsible for the delivery of education to students in Wyoming, including: local school districts, the seven colleges of the Community College System, the University of Wyoming, State and Local Boards of Education, and the Wyoming Department of Education to name just a few. It is therefore imperative that educational movements, such as technology, be approached from a grassroots level and includes all educational sectors.
In November 1995, the Wyoming Supreme Court ruled in Campbell County School District, et al., vs. State of Wyoming, et al., that the funding mechanism for K-12 education in Wyoming was unconstitutional because it did not provide opportunities for equitable education for all children attending Wyoming's K-12 public schools. The Court charged the Wyoming Legislature to resolve this inequitable situation by July, 1997.
The Legislature approached the Court's decision from two fronts.
First, six joint committees were established, drawing upon the
expertise of both houses of the Legislature. A Select Committee
was named to oversee and coordinate the work of the other five
committees. The tasks of the other committees were as follows:
In fulfilling their respective tasks, three of these committees
specifically addressed issues related to technology in education
(see Appendix C for more details),
specifically:
All buildings shall be constructed to allow for the installation of technology infrastructure for use by all students, faculty, and staff. Infrastructure refers to connectivity issues and all necessary frameworks to implement technology. Infrastructure must meet industry standards such as:
- EIA/TIA-568 Telecommunications Cabling Standard
- EIA/TIA-569 Commercial Building Standard for Telecommunication Pathways and Spaces
- TIA/EIA-607 Commercial Building Grounding and Bonding requirements for telecommunications.
Infrastructure is not to be installed at the time of the original construction. The capability to install these systems at a later date shall be provided by the use of empty conduits and cable trays as well as allocated space for head-end, file servers and other equipment.
This work group also suggested that the table below be used as guidelines for constructing computer stations in schools:
| SPACES | GUIDELINES |
|---|---|
| 1. Regular/Science Classrooms | add 15-20 sq. ft. per computer |
| 2. K-5 Computer/Keyboarding Labs | 850 sq. ft. |
| 3. 6-8 Computer/Keyboarding Labs | 1000-1400 sq. ft. |
| 4. 9-12 Computer/Keyboarding Labs | 1000-1400 sq. ft. |
| 5. Main Head-End Room | 450-800 sq. ft. |
| 6. Wiring Closets | 15-120 sq. ft. |
The committee deliberations described above resulted in two laws
being passed during the fifty-fourth legislative session. House
Enrolled Act No. 25 and House Enrolled Act No. 48 were signed into
law in February 1997 (see Appendices D & E for a complete text of the
legislation). The content of these two laws consisted of the
following:
Finally, concurrent with the work of the six legislative committees, a second action undertaken by the Legislature in response to the Supreme Court decision was to contract in July 1996 with Management Analysis & Planning Associates of California (MAP), an independent consulting firm to conduct a "Cost of Education" study for Wyoming. Results of this study were presented in February 1997 to the Legislature, public meetings discussing the results were conducted statewide in March, and subsequent revisions to the report were made in April 1997.
In addition to technological initiatives taking place in the Legislature, several key developments pertaining to technology have occurred elsewhere in the state. At the local level, Wyoming has seen tremendous grassroots growth of technology and telecommunications throughout the state. Moreover, other state and federal activities which have also had an impact on the technology movement in Wyoming include: 1) the Federal Education Programs; 2) Goals 2000-Technology in Education Panel; 3) the Telecommunication Council; 4) the Wyoming's Strategic Direction for Information Technology document; 5) the Leased State Network; and 6) the Universal Service Fund ruling which is part of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. The remainder of this section is devoted to describing each of these activities in further detail.
Wyoming's educational entities have been involved with technology
for a number of years. Technology is being utilized in various
sectors of the state in such areas as:
These grassroots efforts have been funded through local means which include using state funds, federal funds, grants, and asking communities to support technology efforts through additional bonds/mill levies. Although local educational entities have proceeded on their own, there has been little leadership, coordination, and funding from the state in the area of educational technology. This technology plan is an initial effort to provide state guidance and support for all educational technology efforts.
Federal funds, whether targeted specifically for technology or
supportive of other educational goals, have been used for hardware,
software, and professional development activities related to
technology. Specifically, the federal programs through which
educational technology efforts have been supported include the
following:
Primarily, the K-12 sector has access to the federal program funds listed above, however, the community college system does have access to Carl Perkins and Adult Basic Education funds. These educational entities have used such funds to support the purchase of hardware and software for both instructional and administrative purposes. Schools have also developed some or all of their Local Area Networks (LANs) or Wide Area Networks (WANs) using these funds.
Funds from several of the federal programs listed above have also been used to support staff development efforts pertaining to technology. In particular, the Title II Eisenhower Professional Development Program has enabled many professional development activities on topics pertaining to technology to occur.
Finally, specific Wyoming model projects for technology in
education have been supported by:
Initial development of a Wyoming Education Technology Plan began during the Fall of 1995. At this time, Governor Jim Geringer and State Superintendent Judy Catchpole made a decision to leverage Goals 2000 Federal Funds to improve Wyoming's educational technology. They appointed the Wyoming Technology in Education Panel to develop a state education technology plan and a grant process for allocating technology funds.
Although the effort is being facilitated at the state level, the development of the state education technology plan will keep intact Wyoming's unique ability to direct and manage such efforts at the local level across educational sectors. Developers of the state education technology plan promote the opportunity for equitable access to technology for all of our citizens. The payoff for the planning effort will be realized when consensus, support, and ultimately, funding are realities.
Consensus by Panel members on a number of areas have influenced the
content, development, implementation, and evaluation of this plan.
Specifically, the Wyoming Educational Technology Plan evolved out
of the following precepts:
In 1994, the legislature formed the Wyoming Telecommunications
Council. The Council is appointed by the Governor and has been
charged with the following duties:
In January 1995, the Council presented a report to the legislature
entitled "Bridling Expanse." This report
encompasses the Council's first year activities and planning
suggestions, including information on demographics, existing
regulatory climate, and an inventory of existing public and private
telecommunications facilities and projects. This report also
identified the following factors as critical to the development of
a successful technological infrastructure in Wyoming schools:
The Telecommunications Council also provided the legislature with
specific recommendations for the state, including:
Beginning in July 1995, the State of Wyoming, through the Department of Administration and Information (A&I), established a plan to improve the planning and coordination for the state's information technology requirements. One outcome of this effort was the presentation of a document entitled "Wyoming's Strategic Direction for Information Technology." This document provides a framework under which more specific plans, such as the Wyoming Education Technology Plan, may be developed and implemented.
The Wyoming's Strategic Direction for Information
Technology document included recommendations to:
In addition, the "Wyoming's Strategic Direction for Information Technology" pointed out that, because of the great distances and sparse population, Wyoming is considered a high-cost state for telecommunication providers. Subsequently, competition among telecommunication providers needs to be encouraged. This document emphasized the need for partnerships, communication among all entities, and the need for the state to develop an information infrastructure based on voice, video, and data. In sum, it concluded that all of these supports would provide a setting in which access to information is unlimited, allowing availability regardless of location, educational level, special needs, economic status, or ethnicity.
Wyoming currently utilizes a network comprised of an array of leased lines and state-owned digital microwave, to provide access to meet data, voice, and video needs for government, law enforcement agencies, libraries, communities and schools. The bandwidth of this network is capable of handling the government data needs, including Internet connectivity, while allowing enough bandwidth for a compressed video network.
The University of Wyoming, Community College System, and several school districts are connected via the leased state network (see Appendix F for a map of state connectivity). One of the primary uses of the compressed video system is to deliver courses across the state -- primarily post-secondary courses from the University of Wyoming. In the past year, approximately 90 of these courses were delivered. Another use of the compressed video has been to conduct statewide meetings among different educational entities.
Video dial-up service through the use of a service termed "SwitchNet 56" or transmission on a dial-up basis at 56kbps is available throughout much of Wyoming. This leased network system offers distinct advantages to local school districts due to reduced costs and decreased facility needs (no dedicated facility is needed). "Frame Relay", another service available from the telecommunications provider, is also used for data connectivity.
As the state proceeds with the RFP process (described in the Supreme Court Case), the state's leased network will be a critical factor in establishing connectivity across all education buildings.
Section 254(h) of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 specifically provides for discounted rates to elementary schools, secondary schools and libraries for educational purposes for services falling within the definition of universal service. Furthermore, the Federal Communications Commission is to establish competitively neutral rules "A. . . to enhance, to the extent technically feasible and economically reasonable, access to advanced telecommunications and information services for all public and non-profit elementary and secondary school classrooms. . . "
On May 8, 1997, the Federal Communications Commission released its Report and Order in CC Docket No. 96-45 providing the rules governing the universal service support to be provided to schools and libraries. The order adopts discounts from 20 to 90 percent for all telecommunications services, Internet access, and internal connections, with the level of discounts correlated to indicators of poverty and high cost for schools and libraries. The order also mandates that these supported universal services be provided pursuant to a competitive bidding process and requires certain accountability on the part of the schools and libraries. The total support nationwide for the schools and libraries universal service is capped at $2.25 billion annually, distributed generally on a first-come, first-serve basis. Additional details regarding the Federal Communications Commission's order regarding support for schools and libraries may be found in Section X of the May 8, 1997 decision in CC Docket No. 96-45.
|
The 21st century will require children to live, learn, and work in environments vastly different from the traditional classrooms they currently encounter. In order for students to be prepared for the demands of this new era, classrooms and schools need to reflect the changes in philosophy, teaching methods, environment, and equipment which are necessary for students to be competitive and productive in the information and communications age.
Imagine a home...
....where every parent regardless of native language or educational
background can communicate readily with teachers about students'
progress, improve parenting skills, and get an advanced degree or
job training without leaving home or work.
Imagine a school...
.....where every student regardless of economic level, age,
ethnicity, ability or disability can be immersed in the sights,
sounds, and languages of other countries; visit museums; research
the holdings of dispersed libraries; and explore the inner workings
of cells from the inside out or the cold distance of outer space
from inside a virtual space suit.
Imagine a district.....
......where every educator regardless of subject, experience,
location, size or wealth can get hands-on training instantaneously
-- when or where he/she needs it; interact with a virtual community
of professional colleagues; and have access to student performance
data as well as the analytical tools to use them effectively.
Imagine a state...
....where every community member regardless of where they live can
visit the doctor for an examination and needed laboratory tests
while at home or in the office; collaborate with work colleagues at
distant sites; search out primary source materials and data on
events halfway around the world; and take high school or college
courses with fellow students from Meeteetse to Pine Bluffs.
| What needs to happen for these images to become a reality? |
|---|
|
The current educational environment is in a period of transition. The following trends are propelling the traditional educational system towards a learning environment infused with technology:
Future classrooms must reflect everything we know about learning styles, instructional practices, and technology. The state, regions, and educational entities must develop plans and models which reflect the most current technological advances in education.
Infrastructure and professional development are the critical elements to producing a student body that is prepared to process, analyze, synthesize, evaluate and present information in the 21st century. Infrastructure provides the mechanism for accessing information and resources, professional development enables teachers to create a context in which such technology can be integrated into meaningful instructional experiences.
The Technology in Education Panel has begun to define how the Wyoming educational community can create such a learning environment. Resources needed are shown in Table 2:
| Classroom Level | Building Level |
|---|---|
|
|
The Technology in Education Panel recommends the following criteria to be followed by educational agencies who are setting up a technological learning environment:
Criteria for all educational entities:Criteria for the K-12 system:
- Classrooms and buildings will be connected via Local Area Networks (LANs) and Wide Area Networks (WANs) to receive and send voice, video, and data information.
- All teachers/faculty will have a network-capable computer station.
- Staff development plans will include the opportunity to develop skills to utilize and integrate technology for student learning.
Criteria for the post-secondary level:
- Classrooms will be networked to provide the capability to receive and send information through voice and data mechanisms.
- High schools will be networked to provide capability to receive and send information through voice, two-way interactive video, and data mechanisms.
- Network-capable and multimedia-capable computers will be available in the ratio of 1 computer for every 4 students.
- Institutions will provide network capability to receive and send information by voice, data, and video mechanisms in identified locations.
- Network-capable and multimedia-capable computers will be available in the ratio of 1 computer for every 10 students.
- Pre-service training for future teachers will develop skills to utilize and integrate technology for student learning.
|
The outlook section describes the key processes involved in the Wyoming Education Technology Plan. This section discusses issues associated with:
The Technology in Education Panel has met approximately every three months since September 29, 1995, to develop the first Wyoming Education Technology Plan. The panel's strategic planning process included:
The Panel has identified five key components which should be addressed by educational technology plans in Wyoming. These key components are:
Partnerships
Formalized partnerships are essential to the success of each community's plan. The plan will be based on the needs of each community of learners (businesses, community members, students, and government) served by the school districts, the Community College System, and the University of Wyoming.Curriculum Integration
Strategies to integrate technology into the curriculum to support, expand, and improve student learning are essential to maximize the benefits associated with technology. We must maintain a focus on each individual learner and the educational process. It is what each learner does with technology that counts.Staff Development
This component will have a tremendous impact on successful technology integration. Teachers must model effective application of technology for students to gain a competitive edge. Professional development requires time, resources, and commitment.Information Infrastructure
Infrastructure can be viewed at two levels: 1) the statewide communication technology infrastructure; and 2) the infrastructure within classrooms, schools and district buildings. Specifically, the key to this component will deal with connectivity, hardware, software, implementation and maintenance issues. Assistance for local infrastructure development is an integral part of the Wyoming Education Technology Plan and will require a significant investment to install adequate information resources in all Wyoming classrooms.Planning Process
Planning is essential to maximizing the potential benefits of educational technology. Technology planning is an ongoing effort, requiring commitment, cooperation, and coordination at the state, regional, and local levels. Rapid changes in available technologies make continuous assessment and adjustment of plans and implementation strategies important.
The process identified by the Technology in Education Panel for developing the Wyoming Education Technology Plan includes reviewing and synthesizing information from regional and individual educational entity plans into the state plan. The plan will evolve over the next three to five years through the strategic process (see Appendix G). It is estimated that the initial process will take approximately three years to complete.
This "bottom-up" process ensures that the Wyoming Educational Technology Plan will be representative of the entire Wyoming educational system -- with a particular emphasis on the local perspective.
Implementation of all technology plans will evolve as the planning process proceeds and state and federal funding becomes available. Educational entities have already been implementing technology to create access and distance learning opportunities with and without a formal planning process. Therefore, as the planning process defined by the Technology in Education Panel progresses, concurrent implementation efforts at the local, regional, and state levels are likely to continue.
Table 3 below displays the technology needs as identified by the panel and the ways to address them:
| Area of Need | How it is being Addressed |
|---|---|
| Formalized Planning |
|
| Staff Development |
|
| Funding |
|
| Infrastructure |
|
| Resources and Support
(not funding) |
|
As the Wyoming Education Technology Plan (WETP) is implemented, it is anticipated that the roles and structure of the Technology in Education Panel will change in the following ways:
| Current Status of the Technology in Education Panel | Changes for the Technology in Education Panel |
|---|---|
|
|
Evaluation activities will also evolve as Wyoming moves forward towards integrating technology into educational settings. There are three critical segments for evaluation of technology in education. First, technology plan(s) must be evaluated based upon clearly defined criteria. Second, access to technology and actual utilization of such technology needs to be documented. Third, the impact of technology in terms of the relationship between technology and student learning must be assessed.
The Wyoming Department of Education, along with Quality Education Data of Denver, Colorado (QED), conducted a survey in the Fall of 1996 to establish benchmark data for connectivity and computers at the K-12 district and school building levels. At the same time, the Community College Commission sent out a survey to community colleges to establish baseline data for computers. It is the intent of the department and the commission to continue refining the survey instruments and working with QED to collect information about technology and education on a yearly basis. Future survey instruments will focus not only on connectivity, hardware and software, but also on teacher and student usage of technology.
The Wyoming Department of Education realizes that local education agencies fund educational technology from a variety of federal and state programs. Evaluation criteria for technology plans and implementation of such plans needs to be clearly specified across the different state and federal programs.
As with the planning and implementation processes, the evaluation process for technology plans will evolve. The process will be built upon a number of key concepts developed by the Technology in Education Panel (refer to Appendix H for the technology plan scoring matrix). Evaluation of the Wyoming Education Technology Plan will occur through the following steps:
Training for both planning and evaluation needs to occur on a yearly basis. Trainings conducted on an annual basis will include a review of specific evaluation criteria upon which technology plans will be judged.
In addition, K-12 technology plans will be evaluated through the accreditation process. However, the State Board of Education would have to approve the evaluation of technology plans as an additional part of the accreditation process. The sequence of activities involved in this would include:
Implementation of technology plans needs to be regularly monitored. Actual utilization of educational technology by students of different abilities, ages, ethnicity and socioeconomic status must be documented. This process data on how technology has actually been implemented in the classrooms is critical to making sense of outcome data in terms of observed changes in student performance.
Evaluation is part of the planning process and, therefore, part of the key components established by the Technology in Education Panel. As such, each educational entity and region will develop an evaluation process which addresses student learning as part of the technology plan. These evaluation plans will be synthesized into the state plan as it evolves.
Establishing regional technology service centers in Wyoming will be crucial to the effective implementation and evaluation of the Wyoming Education Technology Plan. The purpose of each center will be to provide technical assistance by: 1] promoting partnerships and cooperative ventures; and 2] effectively accessing and disseminating state, regional, and local resources. Regionalizing Wyoming's educational technology efforts will help assure that all public education entities are cooperatively and jointly developing objectives and strategies to meet the state technology goals established by the Technology in Education Panel.
Community involvement is a key to the success of this plan. Therefore, as the technology service centers evolve, the functions they provide for the education entities will also be provided to the community. The Panel suggests that centers be evaluated on a cost versus benefit basis annually.
Based on current information regarding statewide education technology activities, the Panel supports developing seven service centers, using the current Community College System service areas. The purpose of each center would be to provide:
Some benefits of establishing regional technology service centers include:
The service centers will facilitate formal partnerships between participating educational entities. The resulting partnerships will determine decision-making processes and establish a governance structure with common goals for implementing educational technology at the regional level. The state will provide model structures for the regions.
The State Superintendent of Public Instruction will establish a formal partnership with the Community College Commission, the University of Wyoming, and the Wyoming Department of Administration and Information. This formal partnership will establish seven regional technology service centers, based on community college service districts. Steps needed to develop the regional service centers include the following:
As the state moves forward to implement the Wyoming Education Technology Plan, funding for the effort becomes critical. In addition to initial start-up capital, an important funding issue deals with sustainability and continuous support -- equipment needs to be maintained and upgraded on a regular basis.
The 1996 Wyoming State Tech Survey Report (K-12), published by Quality Education Data, indicates that funding to support Wyoming's technology in education efforts were drawn from a myriad of sources, none of which were state allocated dollars. Local and state funds that were used to implement technology were primarily garnered from foundation monies and bond levies. Data also indicated that federal funds were used to aid in implementing technology in education. These funds included monies from Carl Perkins, School-To-Work, Special Education, Goals 2000, and Title I, as well as other grant programs related to technology.
Another funding issue that requires consideration is that of equity. Equity refers to equality of opportunity among districts, schools, classrooms, students, and teachers. Care must be taken not to penalize progressive educational entities that have opted to invest local funding and efforts in educational technology. At the same time, consideration should also be given to those districts and schools that have not had the opportunity to move forward in this area. To strike a balance between the two groups, the Technology in Education Panel supports the concept of establishing a minimum level of technology-related services for all public educational entities. The Technology in Education Panel also supports the concept of expanding the state leased network to support:
To fully implement the Wyoming Education Technology Plan, it is imperative that the funding issues listed below are addressed.
Technology is and will continue to be integral to education. No student in Wyoming should be denied the opportunity to participate in a technology rich learning environment that prepares them for the workforce. To inadvertently limit access to technology will seriously undermine the principles and purposes of public education. Wyoming leaders must be careful to ensure that the educational environment is not populated by "haves" and "have nots," or "users" and "non-users".
The critical issue related to funding for equity of opportunity is continuous and sustainable funding. Wyoming as a state must provide leadership to ensure that technology and related applications in education will be sustained equitably throughout the state.
Several key areas pertaining to the acquisition, implementation, and maintenance of educational technology must be addressed at the local, regional, and state level. These include:
The acquisition and implementation of education technology within any education sector will have ramifications in other parts of the educational community. These additional needs must be funded if the state as a whole is to move forward in its plans to integrate technology into the education arena. Some of these needs will include:
As mentioned in the Background section related to the Supreme Court case, the state is in the process of reviewing how schools are funded. The cost of education study conducted by MAP included some suggestions on funding technology and staff development which may provide a mechanism for sustained and continuous support of educational technology.
As of March 26, 1997, MAP's proposed model suggests that a district be provided a block grant with various categorical spending areas. Part of this block grant could consist of the category of supplies, material, and equipment. However, districts can spend the block grant in whatever manner they choose. MAP has defined the spending categories as follows:
Supplies and instruction materials:
This category contains the items (e.g., chalk, paper, pencils, and erasers) regularly used by teachers and others in a school to provide instruction and to engage in the day-to-day clerical and custodial operations of the school.
Equipment:
This category includes instructional computers, calculators, globes, scientific displays, and specialty items such as gymnastic equipment, used for instructional purposes. Computers are considered to be unusually important because of their potential for enhancing student achievement.
Professional Development:
MAP's model also provides a professional development category, which would be critical for the implementation of technology in education. Districts will be able to utilize these funds for various staff development activities -- including issues related to technology.
Block grants would be based on costs per pupil. Per pupil expenditures would differ by grade and groupings as reflected by instructional program differences.
Although MAP's model addresses the ongoing costs of maintenance and repair associated with technology, it does not address the costs associated with connectivity, hardware and software purchases necessary to achieve equity across the state. As the legislature begins to deliberate on the costs of education, the Wyoming Department of Education (WDE) will provide further recommendations to address the technology and equity issue. Also, the WDE will review the proposed professional development figures to ensure that funding will be available to adequately address educators' professional development needs related to technology.
Sustained and continuous funding must become available so that students and teachers are continually provided with the technology and support necessary for preparing students for the 21st century workforce. Other strategies for providing sustained and continuous funding for the state plan include:
The Panel has estimated costs for implementing technology on a statewide basis. Such costs have been based on a number of assumptions:
Assumption One
Equity in the area of educational technology can be defined as
equity in opportunity to access information. In order to establish
equal access to information, the Wyoming Educational Technology
Plan defines criteria for all educational institutions.
Assumption Two
To achieve the previously listed criteria, funding needs to be
established for one-time costs as well as recurring costs implicit
within additional technology. Both these types of costs are
detailed in the following table:
| One Time Costs | Recurring Costs |
|---|---|
|
|
Assumption Three
Care must be taken not to penalize progressive educational entities
which have opted to invest location funding and efforts in
educational technology while creating an equitable technology
playing field.
Assumption Four
Regional Technology Service Centers are crucial to effectively
implement and evaluate technology efforts in Wyoming. The purpose
of each center will be provide technical assistance by promoting
partnerships and using state, regional, and local resources
effectively.
Assumption Five
State funding established to support education technology will be
distributed over a five year period.
The overall costs of implementing this vision for technology in Wyoming schools are depicted in Table 6 below. These costs are based on the five assumptions previously listed.
| Costs Based on 1 computer per 4 students and 1 computer for each teacher | ||
|---|---|---|
| Item | October 1996 Data from QED | Estimated Costs Based on the Data |
| Outside Connectivity Estimated One-Time Costs | ||
| Outside connectivity costs including branch libraries | Estimate based on summer figures. Need to complete RFP process: house Enrolled Act No. 48 data connectivity to every school building by July 1, 1998 and provide for interactive two-way video capability to each high school in the state by July 1, 2000 | $6,000,000.00 |
| Inside Connectivity Estimated One-Time Costs | ||
| Wiring schools for LANs | Based on 111 schools (31% of the schools do not have LANs: 111 schools out of 353) $25,000/building | $2,775,000.00 |
| Wiring districts for WANs | Based on 29 districts (59% of the districts do not have WANs; 20 districts out of 49) $150,000/district | $4,350,000.00 |
| Computer/Student per state plan, 1 network capable computer per 4 students | 9643 network capable computers in the state (98,774/4=24,694) Total needed: 15,051 $2,000/computer | $30,102,000.00 |
| Computer/Teacher | 6733 certified staff (estimated that 25% have computers) Total needed: 5,050 $2000/computer | $10,101,000.00 |
| Interactive video equipment | Estimated based on 65 high schools $30,000/unit | $1,950,000.00 |
| Regional Centers | State office and 7 centers for 5 years based on the following: 3 years start-up costs: State office $100,000/year, Centers $100,000/ year, years one - three, $75,000/year year four, $50,000/year year five | $3,475,000.00 |
| TOTAL | $58,753,000.00 | |
| Costs Related to Assumption Three | ||
| Districts which have allocated funds to technology and have WANs and LANs. | 20 districts will be provided $562,350 to support technology efforts. This will be accomplished in five years through a competitive grant process. All 20 districts will receive allocated funds. | $11,247,000.00 |
| TOTAL | $70,000,000.00 | |
|
The following objectives and strategies support the single goal of the Wyoming Education Technology Plan. The plan will focus on developing objectives and strategies for five key components that were defined by the Goals 2000--Technology in Education Panel. The five key components are:
Establish educational partnerships among public and private entities by 1999. |
|---|
The cornerstone of community-based technology planning are formalized partnerships. When all stakeholders in a community commit to a collaborative solution by defining common goals and purposes based on needs, resources can be effectively leveraged. Partnerships can include community leaders from business, government, education, and other defined stakeholders. The outcome of formalized partnerships would be the development and implementation of a community technology plan.
Strategies:
- Identify effective resource sharing strategies and practices in educational technology;
- Facilitate community collaboration as part of a long-range technology plan;
- Seek corporate, foundation, state, and federal resources to support education technology plans;
- Create a management structure to support the regional technology service centers and networking systems.
Implement staff development in educational technology for educators in all public educational sectors by 1999. |
|---|
Teachers must be competent users of technology before they can creatively and effectively apply technology. The major task of upgrading Wyoming's educational personnel through staff development cannot be ignored. Every teacher in Wyoming needs readily available resources on information technology and extensive professional development in utilization of these resources. Staff development will require a significant, long-term commitment of time and resources.
Strategies:
- Develop and disseminate standards for pre-service and continuing education in the area of educational technology for school personnel;
- Create professional development programs to assure that standards for educators are met;
- Develop training & support programs on technology at regional technical centers and make such programs available to educators;
- Collaborate in the development, funding, and delivery of staff development opportunities within and between public and private sectors, including the district boards of education, the University of Wyoming, and the colleges of the Wyoming Community College System.
Integrate technology into instructional delivery systems by 1999. |
|---|
Successful technology implementation requires a departure from traditional educational practice. Students must participate in meaningful instructional activities utilizing information technology. They need interaction with their teachers, business leaders, researchers and community members in projects where they use technology to research and produce worthwhile pursuits. Curricula must be rewritten to incorporate instructional technology and develop quality learning opportunities. These opportunities must provide learners with an ability to successfully compete in the workforce.
Strategies:
- Establish a community-based planning process to provide direction in establishing interactive information resources;
- Create, implement, and evaluate educational technology plans, focusing on student learning;
- Define and develop distance learning resources;
- Develop experience-based learning for all students.
Provide equal access to interactive information resources for all learners by 2001. |
|---|
A statewide approach to comprehensive information infrastructure development leverages the aggregated demands of Wyoming's communities, businesses, educational institutions and government. Equal access and quality access to technologies which provide information and communication resources for all Wyoming's learners will be achieved as the infrastructure is built within buildings and throughout the state.
Strategies:
- In cooperation with the private sector, implement and maintain four statewide data communication networks which would connect public educational facilities, including but not limited to: schools, community colleges, university classrooms, libraries, health care agencies, social service agencies, public television, and museums.
- Coordinate the development and distribution of compatible, cost-effective technology, hardware, software, networking guidelines and technology plans;
- Provide equal access to information infrastructure for all learners;
- Establish funding for accessing and integrating technology.
Implement an evaluation process for educational technology plans by 1998. |
|---|
Systematic assessment of implementation is necessary in all successful strategic planning processes. Each major piece of the plan at every level must be assessed on an annual basis. The best instructional practices and professional development strategies must be continually evaluated and implemented to ensure that technological improvements are incorporated in the information infrastructure.
Strategies:
- Design an evaluation method for the plans;
- Collect data and report annually on the implementation of the plans;
- Report deficiencies and recommend revisions in plans;
- Evaluate funding mechanisms needed for implementation of plans. Wyoming Education Technology Plan: Enhancing opportunities for all citizens of Wyoming
Appendices |
| Appendix A | Technology in Education Panel |
| Appendix B | Community College service Districts Map |
| Appendix C | Technology in Education Panel Sub-committees |
| Appendix D | Wyoming House Enrolled Act 25 text |
| Appendix E | Wyoming House Enrolled Act 48 text |
| Appendix F | Wyoming Network Connectivity Map |
| Appendix G | Diagram of State Plan Strategic Process |
| Appendix H | Technology Plan Scoring Matrix |
| Appendix I | Compiled Activities Timeline |
The Technology in Education panel was appointed by the Governor and State Superintendent of Public Instruction. It is a broad-based panel including members from Wyoming's K-12 public schools, private schools, Community College System, University, business leaders, telecommunication service providers, legislators, teachers, Wyoming Education Association, State Libraries & Government, pre-schools, and communities.
Panel Members
Mark Antrim, Natrona County School District No. 1
Stan Bader, US West Communications
Ed Bales, Laramie County Community College
Chuck Bayne, Wyoming Education Association
Sue Belish, Sheridan County School District No. 1
Rob Bernard, Northern Wyoming Community College District
Jack Bottenfield, Eastern Wyoming College
Lesley Boughton, Natrona County Library
Dianne Bramwell, Child Development Center Region II
Jo Campbell, Campbell County School District No. 1
Steve Ellenbecker, Wyoming Public Service Commission
Julie Gillett, US West Communications
Marshall Gingery, Local Boards of Education
Joyce Gould, Park County School District No. 16
David Haas, University of Wyoming
James Hageman, Wyoming State House of Representatives
Ginny Harmelink, Organizations for the Young Child
Darlene Hartman-Hallam, Fremont County School District No. 38
Gloria Hedderman, Business/Labor Leaders
Rob Hurless, Casper Star Tribune
Marie Kalness, Western Tele-Communications, Inc.
Dan King, University of Wyoming
Robert Lemming, Western Tele-Communications, Inc.
Robert Lonzo, Local Boards of Education
George Mathes, Campbell County School District No. 1
Edward McCarthy, Superintendent of Catholic Schools
Larry Nash, Dubois Telephone Exchange
Nell Pederson, Natrona County School District No. 1
Greg Ray, Wyoming Public Television
Bill Schilling, Wyoming Heritage Foundation
Denise Staley, Sweetwater County School District No. 1
Terry Statton, Park County School District No. 6
Richard Strahorn, Sweetwater County School District No. 1
Jim Starr, Business/Labor Leaders
Dave Swanson, Big Horn County School District No. 1
Nick Testi, Central Wyoming Community College
Nedalyn Testolin, Wyoming State Board of Education
Jan Truchot, Crook County School District No. 1
Becky Underwood, Natrona County School District No. 1
Jerome Winter, Northern Wyoming Community College District
Gail Zimmerman, Wyoming State Senate
Wyoming State Liaisons
Monica Asher, Wyoming Department of Education
Tina Carroll, Wyoming Department of Administration &
Information
Linda Carter, Wyoming Department of Education
Brian Greene, Wyoming State Library
Thomas Henry, Wyoming Community College Commission
Birney Holberg, Wyoming Department of Education
Helen Meadors, Wyoming State Library
Alan Sheinker, Wyoming Department of Education
Bruce Snyder, Wyoming Community College Commission
Margaret Spearman, Wyoming Rural Development Council
Larry Stolz, Wyoming Department of Administration & Information
Adell VanPatten-Gorney, Wyoming Professional Teaching Standards
Board
Art VanRensselaer, Wyoming Department of Education
Community College Service Districts |
|
|---|---|
| Northwest Community College - Yellow | Northern Wyoming Community College District - Green |
| Eastern Wyoming Community College - Light Blue | Casper College - Orange |
| Central Wyoming Community College - Blue | Western Wyoming Community College - Red |
| Laramie County Community College - Pink | |
![]() |
|
Technology in Education Panel |
||
|---|---|---|
Purpose:
|
||
Sub-Committees |
||
Grants |
State Plan |
Resources, Connections, and Directions |
| Purpose: Establish criteria for the competitive grant process under GOALS 2000. | Purpose: Compile a statewide technology plan to include, but not limited to areas in connectivity, hardware, software, staff development, instruction, and performance standards. | Purpose Research and establish resources, support, and direction which will enable the state and districts to pursue technology in education |
ORIGINAL HOUSE
BILL NO. 0048
AN ACT relating to public schools; requiring the development and implementation of a state education technology plan as specified; imposing annual reporting requirements; and providing for effective dates.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming:
Section 1.
W.S. 21-2-202(a) by creating a new paragraph (xx) is amended to read:
21-2-2-2. Duties of the state superintendent.
(a) In addition to other duties assigned by law, the state superintendent shall:
(xx) In cooperation with the state board, the Wyoming community college commission, University of Wyoming, state telecommunications council, public service commission, department of transportation, department of administration and information, public libraries, school district boards of trustees, classroom teachers and other appropriate groups identified by the superintendent, develop and implement a statewide education technology plan which shall address staff training, curriculum integration and network connectivity in and between schools, communities and between the state and the world, and which shall have as its goal the provision of equal access to educational instruction and information. Not later than January 10 of each year and with the assistance of participating agencies, an annual report on the status of the statewide education technology plan shall be prepared and issued by the state superintendent.
Section 2.
(a) Except as provided by subsection (b) of this section, this act is effective immediately upon completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution.
(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, the requirement for an annual report pursuant to W.S. 21-2-202(a)(xx) as amended by this act shall be effective beginning January 10, 1998, and each January 10 thereafter.
(END)
ORIGINAL HOUSE
BILL NO. 0115
AN ACT relating to education; providing for implementation of technology in education; specifying process; and providing for an effective date.
Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming
Section 1.
(a) The governor and state superintendent of public instruction will jointly establish a committee of seven (7) persons to develop, in consultation with those entities identified in W.S. 21-2-202(a)(xx), a request for proposal (RFP) in conformance with the industry standards adopted by the committee to implement technology in education in accordance with this section. The RFP shall provide for interactive two-way video capability to each high school in the state by July 1, 2001, and data transmission connectivity to every school building in the state by July 1, 1999.
(b) In developing the RFP, the committee shall recognize and incorporate the need for a data transmission speed sufficient to meet the needs set forth in subsection (a) of this section and those of other state agencies. The RFP shall allow as much flexibility as possible in submitting bid proposals while ensuring the requirements specified in this section are met.
(c) The committee established pursuant to subsection (a) of this section shall review and evaluate all proposals submitted in response to the request for proposal. The committee shall recommend to the governor and state superintendent the proposal which best meets the requirements specified in this section. Any or all of the proposals may be rejected by the governor or state superintendent. If a proposal is accepted by the governor and the state superintendent, a contract implementing the proposal shall be entered into the by the governor and state superintendent on behalf of the state, subject to the appropriation of funds by the legislature sufficient to implement its provisions. If none of the proposals submitted are acceptable to both the governor and state superintendent, the process specified in subsection (a) of this section shall be repeated.
Section 2.
This act is effective immediately upon completion of all acts necessary for a bill to become law as provided by Article 4, Section 8 of the Wyoming Constitution.
(END)
Wyoming Network Connectivity Map |
|---|
|
Diagram of State Plan Strategic Process |
|---|
![]() |
| Establish and formalize partnerships among public and private entities | Implement staff development in educational technology | Align and integrate technology with curriculum and performance standards into instructional delivery systems | Develop an infrastructure to provide equal access to interactive information resources for all learners | Implement an evaluation process for educational technology plans |
| Develop and analyze strategies that support this objective | Develop and analyze strategies that support this objective | Develop and analyze strategies that support this objective | Develop and analyze strategies that support this objective | Develop and analyze strategies that support this objective |
| Identify activities, people involved, and resources needed to that support these strategies | Identify activities, people involved, and resources needed to that support these strategies | Identify activities, people involved, and resources needed to that support these strategies | Identify activities, people involved, and resources needed to that support these strategies | Identify activities, people involved, and resources needed to that support these strategies |
| Establish a timeline and target dates for strategies and activities | Establish a timeline and target dates for strategies and activities | Establish a timeline and target dates for strategies and activities | Establish a timeline and target dates for strategies and activities | Establish a timeline and target dates for strategies and activities |
| Define assessments and measureable indicators for evaluating objectives | Define assessments and measureable indicators for evaluating objectives | Define assessments and measureable indicators for evaluating objectives | Define assessments and measureable indicators for evaluating objectives | Define assessments and measureable indicators for evaluating objectives |
| Complete budget plans, for achieving objectives | Complete budget plans, for achieving objectives | Complete budget plans, for achieving objectives | Complete budget plans, for achieving objectives | Complete budget plans, for achieving objectives |
All Key Components (in tech planning guide - tabs 16-20) will evolve from a task analysis into an action plan which corresponds to the above matrix.
| Phase | Date | Objective # | Activity | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 - 97/98 | June - December 96 | 5 | Evaluation | Key components for technology plans developed and defined |
| June - December 96 | 5 | Evaluation | QED survey sent to each district and school. | |
| June - December 96 | 5 | Evaluation | Community College Commission sent a survey similar to the QED survey to the community colleges. | |
| July - December - 96 | 2 | Planning | Training of seven regional teams for technology planning. | |
| July - December-96 | 2 | Planning | Training in the seven regions occurred for all educational entities on technology planning. Emphasis was on the key components and the importance of including more than infrastructure in a technology plan. | |
| July - December 96 | 5 | Planning | An organized effort to create the first Wyoming state education technology plan was launched. Vision, goals, and key components were established as guiding structures for all education technology plans. | |
| July - December 96 | 1 | Planning | Request that legislation be developed which establishes the State Superintendent of Public Instruction as responsible for developing and implementing a state education technology plan for all educational entities. (See Appendix D for legislative text.) | |
| August - 96 | 1 | Implementation | Goals 2000-Technology in Education Panel was appointed by the Governor and State Superintendent of Public Instruction. | |
| February - 97 | 1 | Planning | Legislation passed identifying the State Superintendent of Public Instruction as responsible for developing and implementing a state education technology plan for all educational entities. | |
| February - 97 | 4 | Implementation | Legislation passed for developing a request for proposal (RFP) to ask vendors to solve the problem of connectivity for school districts. | |
| March - 97 | 5 | Planning | Request for the 57 educational entities to submit technology plans to their respective authoritative body. | |
| March - 97 | 4 | Implementation | Issued second round of Goals 2000 funds for implementing district technology plans. | |
| March - 97 | 5 | Evaluation | Instrument developed to evaluate individual entity plans. (See Appendix H. | |
| April - 97 | 5 | Implementation | Develop Grant LEA process for Goals 2000 and Technology Literacy Challenge Funds. | |
| May - 97 | 5 | Planning | The initial state plan will be completed and reviewed by the public. | |
| May - 97 | 4 | Implementation | Develop RFP and send out to vendors. | |
| May - 97 | 4 | Implementation | Send out grant applications to LEAs. | |
| May - June - 97 | 2 | Planning | Training for regional teams will occur to evaluate technology plans. | |
| June - 97 | 2 | Evaluation | Train regional teams to evaluate technology plans, work with Northwest Regional Lab as resource and trainer. | |
| June - 97 | 1 | Regional Centers | Partnership agreement established for the regional technology centers. | |
| June - 97 | 1 | Regional Centers | Establish job description for state coordinator. | |
| When funding becomes available | 1 | Regional Centers | Hire state coordinator. | |
| July - 97 | 5 | Evaluation | Work with QED to develop 1997 survey for districts and community colleges. | |
| July - 97 | 5 | Evaluation | Develop criteria and rubrics with Northwest Regional Lab for technology plans to present to the State Board of Education in the Fall. | |
| July - 97 | 5 | Evaluation | Develop WDE process(es) or procedure(s) for federal and state technology fund requests for letters of support from WDE for technology grants. | |
| August - 97 | 1 | Implementation | Appoint Technology in Education Panel. | |
| September - 97 | 4 | Implementation | Receive grants back from LEAs. | |
| September - 97 | 2 | Evaluation | Regional training sessions for plans and evaluation. | |
| September - 97 | 5 | Evaluation | Technology plans recommended to the State Board of Education as an accreditation item. | |
| October - 97 | 5 | Planning | Regional training for development of regional plans and re-emphasis of individual plans. | |
| October - 97 | 4 | Implementation | Award technology grants from Goals 2000 and Technology Literacy Challenge Funds. | |
| October - 97 | 5 | Implementation | Prepare Wyoming Education Technology Plan report for legislative session in January. | |
| October - 97 | 4 | Implementation | Review RFP responses and make recommendations to the Governor and State Superintendent of Public Instruction | |
| October - 97 | 5 | Evaluation | QED and WDE send out survey to districts. | |
| October - 97 | 5 | Evaluation | Review the State Education Technology Plan | |
| October - 97 | 5 | Evaluation | Community College commission send a survey similar to the QED survey to the community colleges. | |
| December - 97 | 5 | Implementation | Finalize Wyoming Educational Technology Plan report for legislative session in January. | |
| December - 97 | 5 | Evaluation | Survey data returned to WDE and Community College Commission. | |
| December - 97 | 1 | Regional Centers | Establish formal partnership agreements within regions which outline operational standards and governance structure. | |
| January - 98 | 5 | Planning | Submit plan and report to Legislature | |
| January - 98 | 5 | Implementation | Present Wyoming Education Technology Plan and report to the Legislature. | |
| March - 98 | 1 | Planning | Develop regional plans for submission. | |
| March - 98 | 1 | Planning | Regional plans submitted to State Superintendent of Public Instruction. | |
| March - 98 | 1 | Regional Centers | Regions will designate operational standards, needs, and governance structure for each center in the regional technology plan. | |
| April - 98 | 4 | Implementation | Develop Grant LEA process for Goals 2000 and Technology Literacy Challenge Funds. | |
| May - 98 | 4 | Implementation | Send out grant applications to LEAs. | |
| Phase 2 - 99/00 Biennium | June - 98 | 4 | Evaluation | Train regional tams to evaluate technology plans, work with Northwest Regional Lab as resource and trainer. |
| July - 98 | 5 | Evaluation | Work with QED to develop 1998 survey for districts and community colleges. | |
| August - 98 | 1 | Implementation | Appoint Technology in Education Panel | |
| September - 98 | 4 | Implementation | Receive grants back from LEAs. | |
| September - 98 | 2 | Evaluation | Regional training sessions for plans and evaluation. | |
| September - 98 | 5 | Evaluation | Technology plans recommended to the State Board of Education as an accreditation item.. | |
| October - 98 | 2 | Planning | Regional training on technology plans, review of regional plans, synthesize into state plan. | |
| October - 98 | 4 | Implementation | Award technology grants from Goals 2000 and Technology Literacy Challenge Funds. | |
| October - 98 | 5 | Evaluation | QED and WDe send out survey to districts. | |
| October - 98 | 5 | Evaluation | Review State Education Technology Plan. | |
| October - 98 | 5 | Evaluation | Community College commission send out a survey similar to the QED survey to the community colleges. | |
| December - 98 | 5 | Evaluation | Survey data returned to WDE and Community College Commission. | |
| December - 98 | 1 | Regional Centers | Regional technology centers will be established and initially staffed. | |
| January - 99 | 5 | Planning | Submit plan and report to Legislature. | |
| January - 99 | 5 | Implementation | Submit report to Legislature | |
| March - 99 | 5 | Planning | Regional pans submitted to State Superintendent of Public Instruction. | |
| March - 99 | 5 | Evaluation | Review and revise instrument to evaluate individual entity plans. | |
| April - 99 | 4 | Implementation | Develop Grant LEA process for Goals 2000 and Technology Literacy Challenge Funds. | |
| May - 99 | 4 | Implementation | Send out grant applications to LEAs. | |
| May - 99 | 5 | Regional Centers | Formative evaluation of regional plans and centers completed. | |
| June - 99 | 2 | Evaluation | Train regional teams to evaluate technology plans, work with Northwest Regional Lab as resource and trainer. | |
| July - 99 | 4 | Implementation | Data transmission connectivity to every school building in the state, per legislation. (See Appendix H for legislative text.) | |
| July - 99 | 5 | Evaluation | Work with QED to develop 1999 survey for districts and community colleges. | |
| August - 99 | 1 | Implementation | Appoint Technology in Education Panel | |
| September - 99 | 4 | Implementation | Receive grants back from LEAs. | |
| September - 99 | 2 | Evaluation | Regional training sessions for plans and evaluation. | |
| September - 99 | 5 | Evaluation | Technology plans recommend to the State Board of Education as an accreditation item. | |
| October - 99 | 2 | Implementation | Award technology grants from Goals 2000 and Technology Literacy Challenge Funds. | |
| October - 99 | 5 | Implementation | Prepare Wyoming Education Technology Plan report for legislative session in January. | |
| October - 99 | 5 | Evaluation | QED and WDE send out survey to districts. | |
| October - 99 | 5 | Evaluation | Review the State Education Technology Plan. | |
| October - 99 | 5 | Evaluation | Community College commission send out a survey similar to the QED survey to the community colleges. | |
| December - 99 | 5 | Implementation | Finalize Wyoming Educational Technology Plan report for legislative session in January. | |
| December - 99 | 5 | Evaluation | Survey data returned to WDE and Community College Commission. | |
| December - 99 | 1 | Regional Centers | Review partnership agreements, operational standards, and governance systems. | |
| January - 00 | 5 | Planning | Submit plan and report to Legislature. | |
| January - 00 | 5 | Evaluation | Report on education technology to Wyoming Education Planning and Coordinating Council. | |
| March - 00 | 4 | Planning | Regional plans submitted to State Superintendent of Public Instruction. | |
| March - 00 | 5 | Evaluation | Review and revise instrument to evaluate individual entity plans. | |
| May - 00 | 5 | Regional Centers | Formative evaluation of regional plans and centers completed. | |
| Phase 3 - 01/02 Biennium | June - 00 | 2 | Evaluation | Train regional teams to evaluation technology plans, work with Northwest Regional Lab as resource and trainer. |
| July - 00 | 5 | Evaluation | Work with QEd to develop 2000 survey for districts and community colleges. | |
| July - 00 | 2 | Evaluation | Regional training sessions for plans and evaluation. | |
| August - 00 | 1 | Implementation | Appoint Technology in Education Panel. | |
| September - 00 | 4 | Implementation | Receive grants back from LEAs. | |
| September - 00 | 4 | Evaluation | Technology plans recommended to the State Board of Education as an accreditation item. | |
| October - 00 | 2 | Planning | Regional training on technology plans. | |
| October - 00 | 5 | Planning | Review of regional plans, synthesize into state plan. | |
| October - 00 | 4 | Implementation | Award technology grants from Goals 2000 and Technology Literacy Challenge Fund. | |
| October - 00 | 5 | Evaluation | QED and WDE send out survey to districts. | |
| October - 00 | 5 | Evaluation | Review the State Education Technology Plan. | |
| October - 00 | 5 | Evaluation | Community College Commission sends out a survey similar to the QED survey to the community colleges. | |
| December - 00 | 5 | Evaluation | survey data returned to WDE and Community College Commission. | |
| December - 00 | 1 | Regional Centers | Regional technology centers will be established and initially staffed. | |
| January - 01 | 5 | Planning | Submit plan and report to legislature | |
| January - 01 | 5 | Evaluation | Report on education technology plan to Wyoming Education Planning and Coordinating Council. | |
| March - 01 | 5 | Planning | Regional plans submitted to State Superintendent of Public Instruction | |
| March - 01 | 5 | Evaluation | Review and revise instrument to evaluate individual entity plans. | |
| April - 01 | 4 | Implementation | Develop Grant LEA process for Goals 2000 and Technology Literacy Challenge Fund. | |
| May - 01 | 4 | Implementation | Send out grant applications to LEAs. | |
| May - 01 | 5 | Regional Centers | Formative evaluation of regional plans and centers completed. | |
| June - 01 | 5 | Evaluation | Train regional teams to evaluate technology plans, work with Northwest Regional Lab as resource and trainer. | |
| July - 01 | 4 | Implementation | Interactive two-way video capability at each high school, per legislation. (See Appendix E for legislative text.) | |
| July - 01 | 5 | Evaluation | Work with QED to develop 2001 survey for districts and community colleges. | |
| August - 01 | 1 | Implementation | Appoint Technology in Education Panel. | |
| September - 01 | 4 | Implementation | Receive grants back from LEAs. | |
| September - 01 | 2 | Evaluation | Regional training sessions for plans and evaluation. | |
| September - 01 | 5 | Evaluation | Technology plans recommended to the State Board of Education as an accreditation item. | |
| October - 01 | 4 | Implementation | Award technology grants from Goals 2000 and Technology Literacy Challenge Funds. | |
| October - 01 | 5 | Implementation | Prepare Wyoming Education Technology Plan report for legislative session in January. | |
| October - 01 | 5 | Implementation | Finalize Wyoming Education Technology Plan report for legislative session in January | |
| October - 01 | 5 | Evaluation | QED and WDE send out survey to districts. | |
| October - 01 | 5 | Evaluation | Review the State Education Technology Plan. | |
| October - 01 | 5 | Evaluation | Community College Commission sends out a survey similar to the QED survey to the community colleges. | |
| December - 01 | 5 | Evaluation | Survey data returned to WDE and Community College Commission. | |
| December - 01 | 1 | Regional Centers | Review partnership agreements, operational standards, and governance systems. | |
| January - 02 | 5 | Planning | Submit plan and report to legislature. | |
| March - 02 | 5 | Planning | Regional plans submitted to State Superintendent of Public Instruction. | |
| May - 02 | 5 | Regional Centers | Summative evaluation of regional plans and centers completed. | |
| June - 02 | 5 | Regional Centers | Review job description and need for state coordinator. |