Executive Summary (updated January 26, 1998)
In August 1997, the Wyoming Department of Education commissioned an assessment of all buildings owned and operated by school districts throughout the state. The study, in response to Enrolled Act 2 of the 1997 Special Legislative Session, covered 1,221 buildings totaling 22.9 million gross square feet (GSF) including:
As a part of the assessment, building condition, educational suitability, and technology readiness were evaluated. The need for additional space to accommodate student enrollment was also calculated. The study findings and recommendations are summarized below.
Findings
Building Age
The average age of all buildings owned by school districts in the State of Wyoming is 29.7 years. Exhibit 1 presents the percentages of buildings by age category.
EXHIBIT 1
PERCENTAGE OF BUILDINGS BY AGE CATEGORY
Exhibit 2 presents the average age of buildings for each school district.
EXHIBIT 2
AVERAGE AGE OF BUILDINGS BY DISTRICT

Building Condition
The MGT BASYS (Building Assessment System) condition evaluation system rates buildings on a scale of up to 100, with the highest score reflecting a new or nearly new building. The following overall categories have been developed to provide the reader with categories reflecting the general condition of the buildings that were evaluated.
|
90+ |
New or As New with targeted maintenance normally sufficient to address minor problems
|
|
70-89 |
Good condition with some problems requiring repair and renovation funds
|
|
50-69 |
Fair condition with some problems requiring attention, some of which may need prompt attention
|
|
30-49 |
Poor condition with numerous problems requiring prompt attention to save the building from further deterioration
|
|
Below 30 |
Unsatisfactory – Substantial investments required to restore the building to a useful state. Replacement should be considered.
|
The average condition score of all Wyoming school system buildings, including support facilities, was 73.25. The average condition score for permanent buildings used for instructional purposes was 71.83. This places the average in the "Good" category indicating that the average building is in need of some repair work. Exhibit 3 presents the percentage of buildings by score category.
EXHIBIT 3
PERCENTAGE OF BUILDINGS BY SCORE
1997

Overall, it is encouraging that 93 percent of the buildings are fully functional, although a substantial number have conditions which need attention. Exhibit 4 presents the average condition score for each of the school districts.
EXHIBIT 4
AVERAGE CONDITION SCORE BY DISTRICT

EXHIBIT 4 (continued)

The BASYS condition evaluation system rates 22 building systems in three major categories: structural, mechanical, and safety/building code. The condition of structurally related systems of the buildings evaluated was substantially better than either that of the mechanical systems or the safety/building code systems. The average scores for all buildings were:
|
Structural Systems: |
80.36 |
|
Mechanical Systems: |
66.76 |
|
Safety/Building Code Systems: |
46.26 |
This indicates that the most visible systems, e.g. walls, foundations, windows, etc. are in the best relative condition while the less visible systems, e.g. heating, cooling, fire alarms, etc. need the most attention.
Building Condition/Age Profile
Exhibit 5 provides a perspective which links the age of district buildings to the rated condition. The rows reflect the number of buildings by age category while the columns indicate the number of buildings by score category.
EXHIBIT 5
BUILDING CONDITION/AGE PROFILE
1997

Educational Suitability
Schools were rated for educational suitability defined as the degree to which the facility was suitable for the educational program being offered. Since the educational suitability is a function of the educational program, the evaluators administered a questionnaire to the school administrator to determine the suitability rating. The following overall categories have been developed to provide the reader with an understanding of the numerical scores.
|
80+ |
Good – the facility has minor suitability issues but generally meets the needs of the educational program. |
|
50-79 |
Fair – the facility has some problems meeting the needs of the educational program and may require some remodeling or additions. |
|
30-49 |
Poor – the facility has numerous problems meeting the needs of the educational program and needs significant remodeling or additions. |
|
Below 30 |
Unsatisfactory – the facility essentially meets no needs of the educational program and consideration should be given to discontinuing the use of the facility. |
The average educational suitability score for schools statewide was 71.66. This indicates that the average building is generally suitable for the educational program but has some problems meeting all of the program needs.
Technology Readiness
The rating instrument assessed the existence of the required infrastructure to support informational technology and the associated equipment, typically computers. The following overall categories have been developed to provide the reader with an understanding of the numerical scores.
|
80+ |
Good – the facility has the infrastructure for informational technology
|
|
50-79 |
Fair – the facility is lacking some infrastructure
|
|
30-49 |
Poor – the facility is lacking substantial infrastructure to support technology
|
|
Below 30 |
Unsatisfactory – the facility essentially has no technology infrastructure and will require a significant investment
|
The average technology readiness score of educational buildings statewide is 31.65. This indicates that most buildings do not have the infrastructure necessary to support today’s educational technology requirements. As with the suitability score, this low technology readiness score clearly reflects the 30 year average age of buildings in the state and indicates that a substantial amount of retrofitting will need to be accomplished to provide the necessary infrastructure.
Building Accessibility
The condition assessment conducted in this study was not a comprehensive barrier analysis per the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) . However, the evaluators prepared a summary accessibility evaluation to provide the Department of Education with the information as to where major facility problems exist. Buildings were rated on a four part scale of "Good," "Fair," "Poor," and "Unsatisfactory" where "Good" indicated apparent general compliance with the ADA regarding building accessibility and "Unsatisfactory" indicates inaccessibility.
The average score for the state was 2.4 on a scale of 1-4, with 4 being "Good." Of the 1,221 buildings, 843 were evaluated for accessibility (buildings such as pump houses, teacherages, etc. were not evaluated for accessibility). The number of buildings rated in each of the categories is as follows:
|
Abbreviated ADA Definitions |
Number of Buildings |
Percent |
|
|
Good - Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act regarding building accessibility appear to be complied with. |
83 |
9.9 |
|
|
Fair - Building is accessible, however all rooms are not accessible or all levels are not directly accessible. Some restrooms are accessible. |
298 |
35.3 |
|
|
Poor - Building is accessible but not up to ADA standards. No restrooms meet requirements. |
298 |
35.3 |
|
|
Unsatisfactory - Building is inaccessible. No access to any level. |
164 |
19.5 |
|
|
843 |
100% |
Capacity
The study also reviewed space requirements of the districts in terms of the square footage requirements incorporated in the Department’s "Rules for Site Selection and School Construction for Wyoming Public School Buildings." Those rules establish standards in terms of minimum square footage amounts per pupil as follows:
The analysis found that 13 districts did not meet state standards in one or more grade grouping categories, e.g., elementary. Four districts were deficient in all three categories resulting in an overall total of 22 district/grade grouping areas where added space is needed to meet state standards.
Recommendations
The study found that approximately $362.9 million could be justifiably spent to bring all of the 1,221 buildings assessed to an "As New" condition as defined above.
Exhibit 6 presents a breakdown of the needed repairs in dollar amounts by building system and by educational and "all other" buildings for the state as a whole.
Exhibit 6
Needed Repairs and Renovations – by Category

Of the above amount, we estimate that $303,973,131 can be associated with "deferred maintenance" as defined in Act 2. This amount is equal to the needed repairs to structural and mechanical/electrical systems. In addition to the amount shown in Exhibit 6, we estimate that $2,012,231 will be needed for the added cost of demolition and complete replacement of the ten buildings that had a combined score below 30. These buildings should normally not be renovated.
It is recognized that the state will need to prioritize its resources to meet the most pressing needs and that funds will need to be allocated accordingly. Although the exact approach will be a Legislative decision, we have prepared Exhibits 7-9 to identify the repair and renovation needs by the degree of severity of building condition. The $2 million for demolition and related costs is included in these tables.
EXHIBIT 7
NEEDED REPAIRS – educational buildings
By Severity of building condition

EXHIBIT 8
NEEDED REPAIRS – Other district buildings
By Severity of building condition
|
Categories |
Subtotal |
Cumulative Total |
||
|
Replacement of Unsatisfactory Buildings (below 30) |
$ 1,059,806 |
|||
|
$ 1,059,806 |
||||
|
Buildings in Poor Condition (30 - 39) |
$ 2,732,237 |
|||
|
$ 3,792,043 |
||||
|
Buildings in Poor to Fair Condition (40 - 49) |
$ 4,570,656 |
|||
|
$ 8,362,699 |
||||
|
Buildings in Fair Condition (50 - 59) |
$ 6,068,526 |
|||
|
$ 14,431,226 |
||||
|
Buildings in Fair to Good Condition (60 - 69) |
$ 7,961,519 |
|||
|
$ 22,392,745 |
||||
|
Buildings in Good Condition (70+) |
$ 11,909,240 |
|||
|
$ 34,301,985 |
||||
EXHIBIT 9
NEEDED REPAIRS – Statewide all buildings
By Severity of building condition
|
Categories |
Subtotal |
Cumulative Total |
||
|
Replacement of Unsatisfactory Buildings (below 30) |
$ 4,190,457 |
|||
|
$ 4,190,457 |
||||
|
Buildings in Poor Condition (30 - 39) |
$ 6,115,318 |
|||
|
$ 10,305,775 |
||||
|
Buildings in Poor to Fair Condition (40 - 49) |
$ 41,646,164 |
|||
|
$ 51,951,939 |
||||
|
Buildings in Fair Condition (50 - 59) |
$ 84,259,994 |
|||
|
$ 136,211,933 |
||||
|
Buildings in Fair to Good Condition (60 - 69) |
$ 107,612,766 |
|||
|
$ 243,824,699 |
||||
|
Buildings in Good Condition (70+) |
$ 121,055,140 |
|||
|
$ 364,879,839 |
||||
In the areas of educational suitability, technological readiness, and student capacity, the following cost estimates have been prepared:
EXHIBIT 10
suitability costs by SUITABILITY CATEGORY

EXHIBIT 11
Technology costs by TECHNOLOGY CATEGORY

EXHIBIT 12
Districts and Grade Groupings
where gross square feet per pupil is below state standards
|
County/District |
Type |
Existing GSF |
GSF Per Standard |
Percent of Standard |
Amt. Where Below 75% of Standard |
Amt. Where Below 100% of Standard |
|
Albany 1 |
Middle |
155,649 |
191,800 |
81% |
$ 2,711,325 |
|
|
Converse 1 |
Elementary |
101,162 |
104,020 |
97% |
$ 214,350 |
|
|
Fremont 1 |
Middle |
56,000 |
64,575 |
87% |
$ 643,125 |
|
|
Fremont 25 |
Elementary |
121,802 |
163,940 |
74% |
$ 3,160,350 |
$ 3,160,350 |
|
Middle |
86,104 |
128,975 |
67% |
$ 3,215,325 |
$ 3,215,325 |
|
|
High |
194,102 |
214,620 |
90% |
$ 1,538,850 |
||
|
Goshen 1 |
Elementary |
89,800 |
93,380 |
96% |
$ 268,500 |
|
|
Laramie 1 |
Elementary |
856,753 |
1,049,300 |
82% |
$14,441,025 |
|
|
Middle |
470,396 |
574,350 |
82% |
$ 7,796,550 |
||
|
High |
514,227 |
598,290 |
86% |
$ 6,304,725 |
||
|
Lincoln 2 |
Elementary |
164,742 |
168,140 |
98% |
$ 254,850 |
|
|
Middle |
67,869 |
69,650 |
97% |
$ 133,575 |
||
|
High |
104,210 |
172,410 |
60% |
$ 5,115,000 |
$ 5,115,000 |
|
|
Natrona 1 |
Elementary |
814,518 |
938,420 |
87% |
$ 9,292,650 |
|
|
Middle |
491,950 |
514,850 |
96% |
$ 1,717,500 |
||
|
Park 1 |
Elementary |
97,321 |
119,700 |
81% |
$ 1,678,425 |
|
|
Sublette 1 |
Middle |
22,365 |
26,775 |
84% |
$ 330,750 |
|
|
Sweetwater 2 |
High |
198,739 |
249,690 |
80% |
$ 3,821,325 |
|
|
Teton 1 |
Elementary |
113,154 |
127,400 |
89% |
$ 1,068,450 |
|
|
Middle |
81,196 |
92,400 |
88% |
$ 840,300 |
||
|
High |
105,340 |
127,890 |
82% |
$ 1,691,250 |
||
|
Washakie 1 |
Elementary |
97,790 |
111,300 |
88% |
$ 1,013,250 |
|
|
Totals |
5,005,189 |
5,901,875 |
85% |
$ 11,490,675 |
$67,251,450 |
The total of the amounts calculated for the four categories of needs identified in Exhibits 7 through 12 equals $565,112,217, including the $2 million for demolition and related costs.